Task Scheduling with Optimized Transmission Time in Collaborative Cloud-Edge Learning
Abstract
Deep learning has been applied in many recent advanced applications in the field of transportation, finance and medicine. These applications require significant computation resources and large-scale training samples. Cloud becomes a natural choice for conducting these learning tasks due to its abundant resources. However, deeper penetration of deep learning techniques in mission critical applications, like driverless car, calls for stricter time requirement to guarantee its interaction and larger amount of dataset for training to guarantee its accuracy, which cannot be easily satisfied by the cloud and makes the network transmission become the bottleneck. Edge learning emerges to be a promising direction to reduce data transmission time by processing and compressing the raw data at the edge of the network, while brings the concern of accuracy reduction at the meantime. To balance this tradeoff under cloud-edge architecture, we study a task scheduling problem for reducing weighted transmission time which takes learning accuracy into consideration. We also propose efficient scheduling algorithms which are able to achieve up to 50% reduction in makespan with extensive trace-driven simulations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For computation-intensive tasks, segmenting and dispatching them to the end, edge and cloud reduces execution delay while ensuring accuracy.
“For a computation-intensive task, it will be reasonably segmented and dispatched separately to the end, edge and cloud for execution, reducing the execution delay of the task while ensuring the accuracy of the results [12], [49], [50].”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
DeepCham: Collaborative Edge-Mediated Adaptive Deep Learning for Mobile Object Recognition
Li, D., Salonidis, T., Desai, N. V., & Chuah, M. C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) · doi:10.1109/sec.2016.38 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
“For a computation-intensive task, it will be reasonably segmented and dispatched separately to the end, edge and cloud for execution, reducing the execution delay of the task while ensuring the accuracy of the results [12], [49], [50].”
BackgroundMethodEfficient Acceleration of Deep Learning Inference on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices: A Review
Shuvo, M. M. H., Islam, S. K., Cheng, J., & Morshed, B. I. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3226481 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
“Scheduling schemes for edge training are presented in [352], where the edge devices upload a training profile requesting cloud access.”
BackgroundBackup Battery Analysis and Allocation against Power Outage for Cellular Base Stations
Wang, F., Fan, X., Wang, F., & Liu, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2018.2842733 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Huang, Y., Zhu, Y., Fan, X., Ma, X., Wang, F., Liu, J., Wang, Z., & Cui, Y.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- 2018 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-07
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 1095-2055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896070538
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Keywords
- task scheduling, edge-cloud computing, cooperative learning, deep learning training, transmission time, makespan minimization, learning accuracy, data compression, scheduling algorithms, trace-driven simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review