Cited by 36IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCloud Computing and Resource ManagementEnergy Efficiency in Computing

Task Scheduling with Optimized Transmission Time in Collaborative Cloud-Edge Learning

Huang, Yutao, Zhu, Yifei, Fan, Xiaoyi, Ma, Xiaoqiang, Wang, Fangxin, Liu, Jiangchuan, Wang, Ziyi, Cui, Yong·2018·2018 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)

Abstract

Deep learning has been applied in many recent advanced applications in the field of transportation, finance and medicine. These applications require significant computation resources and large-scale training samples. Cloud becomes a natural choice for conducting these learning tasks due to its abundant resources. However, deeper penetration of deep learning techniques in mission critical applications, like driverless car, calls for stricter time requirement to guarantee its interaction and larger amount of dataset for training to guarantee its accuracy, which cannot be easily satisfied by the cloud and makes the network transmission become the bottleneck. Edge learning emerges to be a promising direction to reduce data transmission time by processing and compressing the raw data at the edge of the network, while brings the concern of accuracy reduction at the meantime. To balance this tradeoff under cloud-edge architecture, we study a task scheduling problem for reducing weighted transmission time which takes learning accuracy into consideration. We also propose efficient scheduling algorithms which are able to achieve up to 50% reduction in makespan with extensive trace-driven simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icccn.2018.8487352

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For computation-intensive tasks, segmenting and dispatching them to the end, edge and cloud reduces execution delay while ensuring accuracy.

    “For a computation-intensive task, it will be reasonably segmented and dispatched separately to the end, edge and cloud for execution, reducing the execution delay of the task while ensuring the accuracy of the results [12], [49], [50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y., Zhu, Y., Fan, X., Ma, X., Wang, F., Liu, J., Wang, Z., & Cui, Y.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
2018 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-07
Pages
1-9
ISSN
1095-2055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896070538
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
Keywords
task scheduling, edge-cloud computing, cooperative learning, deep learning training, transmission time, makespan minimization, learning accuracy, data compression, scheduling algorithms, trace-driven simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review