Steering Angle Prediction for Autonomous Driving using Federated Learning: The Impact of Vehicle-To-Everything Communication
Abstract
When it comes to the application of new technology, the automotive industry is one of the most rapidly expanding industries in the world. The recent trend in this field is autonomous driving using machine learning (ML) techniques. The training of ML models that can provide human-like driving decisions requires a large amount of heterogeneous data to be collected from multiple vehicles for training, testing and validation of the autonomous driving system. This large volume of heterogeneous data can be obtained using connected vehicles, where each vehicle can share the collected data with a central server using vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication. The objective of this work is to analyze and compare the performances of the ‘centralized’ and ‘federated’ approaches to training the ML models using V2X communication under various channel conditions. The specific application being considered for this work is the ‘prediction of the steering angle using a vision-based dataset’. The results obtained in our study indicate that: (i) even though the conventional ML approach may work reasonably well up to a certain bit error rate (BER) where the ML model is trained using noisy images, its performance degrades at higher BER values due to noise-overfitting, and (ii) the federated learning (FL) approach can indeed provide a better alternative to the centralized ML approach for the considered application, consuming less bandwidth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Study [91] optimized edge model quality by adding noise and incorporating various data sources across vehicles.
“Another study [91] optimized edge model quality by adding noise and incorporating various data sources across vehicles.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [91]
Cites
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
Link level performance comparison between LTE V2X and DSRC
Hu, J., Chen, S., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Fang, J., Li, B., & Shi, Y. (2017) · Journal of Communications and Information Networks · doi:10.1007/s41650-017-0022-x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- M P, A., R, G., & Panda, M.
- Affiliations
- Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,SIERS Research Lab, Amrita School of Engineering,Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering,Coimbatore,India
- Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
- ORCID
- Panda, Manoj
- Venue
- 2021 12th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-07-06
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W3213080933
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- steering angle prediction, autonomous driving, federated learning, vehicle-to-everything communication, connected vehicles, bit error rate, bandwidth consumption, channel conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review