The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart Watermark to Defend against Deepfake Image Manipulation
Abstract
Deepfake image manipulation has become a serious security threat to the social network. Currently, there are limited studies on protective methods that are against Deepfake image manipulation. To tackle this problem, we here propose an adversary attack based smart watermark model, which adds unperceptive watermarks to images so that the images become adversary examples to Deepfake models. When the Deepfake manipulates these watermarked images, the manipulated images become blur. The manipulation thus can be easily recognized by human and machines. Our experiments have shown that our model outperforms the SOTA and can be used to effectively prevent Deepfake manipulation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Image Quality Assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—A Comparative Study
Sara, U., Akter, M., & Uddin, M. S. (2019) · Journal of Computer and Communications · doi:10.4236/jcc.2019.73002 · Cited by 1,689 · cited 1×
“The larger 𝐿 𝑓𝑑 is, the better disruption is.”
Deepfakes and beyond: A Survey of face manipulation and fake detection
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · Cited by 1,237
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1109/TMM.2019.2936305 · DOI
- wang, 2019, FakeSpotter A simple yet robust baseline for spotting AI-synthesized fake faces[J]
- 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00872 · DOI · Paper page
- rössler, 2018, FaceForensics A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces
- 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01356 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13735-018-0147-1 · DOI · Paper page
- wang, 2020, DeepTag Robust Image Tagging for Deepfake Provenance[J]
- 10.1007/978-3-030-01267-0_40 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00219 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01356 · DOI
- huang, 2020, FakeRetouch Evading Deepfakes Detection via the Guidance of Deliberate Noise[J]
- liu, 2018, Large-scale celebfaces attributes (celeba) dataset[J], Retrieved, 15 (2018)
- 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01398 · DOI
- 10.1109/CISP-BMEI48845.2019.8965869 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2886017 · DOI · Paper page
- yadav, 2019, Deepfake: A survey on facial forgery technique using generative adversarial network[C]//2019, International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS) IEEE, 852
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905015 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00916 · DOI · Paper page
- ruiz, 2020, Disrupting Deepfakes Adversarial attacks against conditional image translation networks and facial manipulation systems[C]//European Conference on Computer Vision, 236
- agarwal, 2019, Protecting World Leaders Against Deep Fakes[C]//CVPR Workshops, 38
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.24963/ijcai.2018/543 · DOI
- xu, 2020, Generate Adversarial Examples by Nesterov-momentum Iterative Fast Gradient Sign Method[C]//2020, IEEE 11th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), 244
- muncsan, 2020, Transferability of Fast Gradient Sign Method[C]//, Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, 23
- 10.1109/WACVW50321.2020.9096939 · DOI
- deng, 2020, Universal adversarial attack via enhanced projected gradient descent[C]//2020, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 1241, 10.1109/ICIP40778.2020.9191288 · DOI
- xu, 2020, Real-Time Face Recognition Based on Dlib[M]//Innovative Computing, 1451
- 10.1109/WACVW50321.2020.9096939 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring autonomous methods for deepfake detection: A detailed survey on techniques and evaluation
Sunil, R., Mer, P., Diwan, A., Mahadeva, R., & Sharma, A. (2025) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42273 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Lv, L.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lv, Luochen
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-04-23
- Pages
- 380-384
- OpenAlex
- W3176547173
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, image watermarking, adversarial examples, image editing, image blurring, social media security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review