The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An English Islamic Articles Dataset (EIAD) for developing an IslamBot Question Answering Chatbot
Abstract
A chatbot is one of the most vastly recommended technologies to be used during these decades, especially through the digitization era. It could save much consumed time for both the users and the customer service employees. Chatbots could provide an answer to the asked questions instantly. IslamBot is an Islamic religion chatbot “i.e.,” responsible for answering any inquiries related to the Islamic religion. The aimed audience is non-Muslims people willing to join Islam or New-Muslims. Building such types of chatbots need to have an enormous amount of trusted data. Accordingly, in this paper The English Islamic Articles dataset (EIAD) is proposed as a benchmark reference for English Islamic question answering. So, this dataset contains about 10000 English Islamic articles. It is scrapped from authenticated and trusted websites like NewMuslims.com [1] IslamReligion.com [2], and IslamQA.com [3]. The dataset is about 275 articles from NewMuslims.com [1], 1550 articles from IslamReligion.com [2], and 8292 articles from IslamQA.com [3]. The EIAD dataset is a structured dataset “i.e.,” labeled and categorized. This dataset contains about 15 different categories. Each category is covering several different topics. This paper focuses on discussing how The English Islamic Articles dataset (EIAD) has been collected.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 0, binbaz org sa/articles
- 0, Arabic AskFM dataset - Omar Essam
- 0, www alifta gov sa
- 0, AlFawzan af org sa
- 0, The Holy Quran I Kaggle
- 0, Database 2012–2020 on anti-Muslim hatred - Data Europa EU
- 0, Google Colaboratory Lab
- 0, BeautifulSoup Package
- corney, 2016, What do a Million News Articles Look like?
- 0, Categories - Islam Question & Answer
- corney, 0, What do a Million News Articles Look like?, NewsIR ECIR
- 10.1145/1143844.1143892 · DOI
- 0, fatwapedia com
- 10.47760/ijcsmc.2021.v10i04.017 · DOI
- 0, Islam Religion Website
- 0, website of New Muslims
- 0, binothaimeen net
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions
Atif, F., Askarbekuly, N., Darwish, K., & Choudhury, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v8i1.36543 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohammed, M., Amin, S., & Aref, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Ain Shams University (EG)
- Ain Shams University,Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences,Basic Science Department,Cairo,Egypt
- ORCID
- Aref, Mostafa M.
- Venue
- 2022 5th International Conference on Computing and Informatics (ICCI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-03-09
- Pages
- 303-309
- OpenAlex
- W4224274657
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Computing and Informatics (ICCI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
- Keywords
- chatbots, datasets, benchmark, new Muslims, web scraping, question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review