Cited by 25Academic integrity and plagiarismSoftware Engineering ResearchNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

APlag: A plagiarism checker for Arabic texts

El Bachir Menai, Mohamed, Bagais, Manar·2011·2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE)

Abstract

Plagiarism is a serious problem, especially in academia and education. Detecting it is a challenging task, particularly in natural language texts. Many plagiarism detection tools have been developed for diverse natural languages, mainly English. Language-independent tools exist as well, but are considered as too restrictive as they usually do not consider specific language features. In this paper, we introduce APlag, a new plagiarism detection tool for Arabic texts, based on a logical representation of a document as paragraphs, sentences, and words, and new heuristics for text comparison. We describe its main attributes and present the results of some experiments conducted on a dummy test set. We demonstrate its effectiveness by comparing its performance to that of APD, a plagiarism detection tool for Arabic. Overall, preliminary results show that APlag significantly improves the results obtained by APD in terms of recall and precision metrics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccse.2011.6028888

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. levenshtein, 1965, Binary codes with correction for deletions and insertions of the symbol 1, Probl Peredachi Inf, 1, 12
  2. kernighan, 1988, The C Programming Language
  3. 10.11120/ital.2005.04020006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. pataki, 0, Plagiarism detection and document chunking methods, The 12th Int WWW Conf Budapest Hungaria May 20-24 2003
  5. alzahrani, 0, Statement-based fuzzy-set IR versus fingerprints matching for plagiarism detection in Arabic documents, Proc of the 5th Postgraduate Annual Research Seminar (PARS09) Johor Bahru Malaysia 2009
  6. 10.1145/331697.335176 · DOI
  7. wise, 1995, Neweyes: A system for comparing biological sequences using the running Karp-Rabin Greedy String-Tiling algorithm, Proc of Int Conf on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, 3, 393
  8. maurer, 2006, Plagiarism - A survey, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12, 1050
  9. 10.1147/rd.312.0249 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/1330598.1330642 · DOI · Paper page
  11. shivakumar, 0, SCAM: A copy detection mechanism for digital documents, Proc of the 2rd Int Conf on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries Austin Texas USA June 1995
  12. 10.1002/asi.10170 · DOI
  13. mozgovoy, 0, Using natural language parsers in plagiarism edtection, Proc of the SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education Farmington Pennsylvania USA 2007
  14. menai, 2010, Similarity detection in Java programming assignments, Proc of the 5th Int Conf on Computer Science & Education Hefei China, 356
  15. 10.1145/1066677.1066854 · DOI
  16. manber, 0, Finding similar files in a large file system, Winter USENIX Technical Conf San Francisco CA USA 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
El Bachir Menai, M., & Bagais, M.
Affiliations
King Saud University (SA)
Venue
2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-08
Pages
1379-1383
OpenAlex
W2150409536
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
plagiarism detection, Arabic text, document representation, APD, academic integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: APlag: A plagiarism checker for Arabic texts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccse.2011.6028888
The paper
El Bachir Menai, M., & Bagais, M. (2011). APlag: A plagiarism checker for Arabic texts. 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccse.2011.6028888