The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shadow puppetry
Abstract
The mapping between 3D body poses and 2D shadows is fundamentally many-to-many and defeats regression methods, even with windowed context. We show how to learn a function between paths in the two systems, resolving ambiguities by integrating information over the entire length of a sequence. The basis of this function is a configural and dynamical manifold that summarizes the target system's behaviour. This manifold can be modeled from data with a hidden Markov model having special topological properties that we obtain via entropy minimization. Inference is then a matter of solving for the geodesic on the manifold that best explains the evidence in the cue sequence. We give a closed-form maximum a posteriori solution for geodesics through the learned density space, thereby obtaining optimal paths over the dynamical manifold. These methods give a completely general way to perform inference over time-series; in vision they support analysis, recognition, classification and synthesis of behaviours in linear time. We demonstrate with a prototype that infers 3D from monocular monochromatic sequences (e.g., back-subtractions), without using any articulatory body model. The framework readily accommodates multiple cameras and other sources of evidence such as optical flow or feature tracking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Cited by
A Survey of Computer Vision-Based Human Motion Capture
Moeslund, T. B., & Granum, E. (2001) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.2000.0897 · Cited by 1,768
Vision-based human motion analysis: An overview
Poppe, R. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.016 · Cited by 835
Tracking multiple humans in complex situations
Zhao, T., & Nevatia, R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.73 · Cited by 490
Action Recognition from Arbitrary Views using 3D Exemplars
Weinland, D., Boyer, E., & Ronfard, R. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4408849 · Cited by 448
Performance animation from low-dimensional control signals
Chai, J., & Hodgins, J. K. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073248 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Brand, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 1237-1244 vol.2
- OpenAlex
- W2294392286
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shadow puppetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.1999.790422
- The paper
- Brand, M. (1999). Shadow puppetry. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.1999.790422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.