The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust principal component analysis for computer vision
Abstract
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been widely used for the representation of shape, appearance and motion. One drawback of typical PCA methods is that they are least squares estimation techniques and hence fail to account for "outliers" which are common in realistic training sets. In computer vision applications, outliers typically occur within a sample (image) due to pixels that are corrupted by noise, alignment errors, or occlusion. We review previous approaches for making PCA robust to outliers and present a new method that uses an intra-sample outlier process to account for pixel outliers. We develop the theory of Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA) and describe a robust M-estimation algorithm for learning linear multi-variate representations of high dimensional data such as images. Quantitative comparisons with traditional PCA and previous robust algorithms illustrate the benefits of RPCA when outliers are present. Details of the algorithm are described and a software implementation is being made publically available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725382 · Cited by 5,609
Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer
Oja, E. (1982) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00275687 · Cited by 2,309
A robust principal component analysis
Ruymgaart, F. H. (1981) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/0047-259x(81)90091-9 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Traditional and recent approaches in background modeling for foreground detection: An overview
Bouwmans, T. (2014) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2014.04.001 · Cited by 676
Nonlocal Image Restoration With Bilateral Variance Estimation: A Low-Rank Approach
Dong, W., Shi, G., & Li, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2221729 · Cited by 655
Zhang, K., Zhang, L., & Yang, M.-H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2315808 · Cited by 536
Analysis of Rain and Snow in Frequency Space
Barnum, P. C., Narasimhan, S., & Kanade, T. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-008-0200-2 · Cited by 356
A comparative study on diabetes disease diagnosis using neural networks
Temurtas, H., Yumusak, N., & Temurtas, F. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.032 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- De la Torre, F., & Black, M. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 362-369
- OpenAlex
- W2140151376
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust principal component analysis for computer vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2001.937541
- The paper
- De la Torre, F., & Black, M. J. (2002). Robust principal component analysis for computer vision. Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2001.937541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.