The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discriminative random fields: a discriminative framework for contextual interaction in classification
Open accessAbstract
In this work we present discriminative random fields (DRFs), a discriminative framework for the classification of image regions by incorporating neighborhood interactions in the labels as well as the observed data. The discriminative random fields offer several advantages over the conventional Markov random field (MRF) framework. First, the DRFs allow to relax the strong assumption of conditional independence of the observed data generally used in the MRF framework for tractability. This assumption is too restrictive for a large number of applications in vision. Second, the DRFs derive their classification power by exploiting the probabilistic discriminative models instead of the generative models used in the MRF framework. Finally, all the parameters in the DRF model are estimated simultaneously from the training data unlike the MRF framework where likelihood parameters are usually learned separately from the field parameters. We illustrate the advantages of the DRFs over the MRF framework in an application of man-made structure detection in natural images taken from the Corel database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., & Shah, M. (2006) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1177352.1177355 · Cited by 4,792
Segmentation and Recognition Using Structure from Motion Point Clouds
Brostow, G. J., Shotton, J., Fauqueur, J., & Cipolla, R. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_5 · Cited by 1,050
Auto-Context and Its Application to High-Level Vision Tasks and 3D Brain Image Segmentation
Tu, Z., & Bai, X. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.186 · Cited by 578
Interactive Image Segmentation Using an Adaptive GMMRF Model
Blake, A., Rother, C., Brown, M., Perez, P., & Torr, P. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24670-1_33 · Cited by 527
Image Parsing: Unifying Segmentation, Detection, and Recognition
Tu, Z., Chen, X., Yuille, A. L., & Zhu, S.-C. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-005-6642-x · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, S., & Hebert
- Venue
- Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 1150-1157 vol.2
- OpenAlex
- W2124189704
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminative random fields: a discriminative framework for contextual interaction in classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2003.1238478
- The paper
- Kumar, S., & Hebert. (2003). Discriminative random fields: a discriminative framework for contextual interaction in classification. Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2003.1238478
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.