The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-metric affinity propagation for unsupervised image categorization
Abstract
Unsupervised categorization of images or image parts is often needed for image and video summarization or as a preprocessing step in supervised methods for classification, tracking and segmentation. While many metric-based techniques have been applied to this problem in the vision community, often, the most natural measures of similarity (e.g., number of matching SIFT features) between pairs of images or image parts is non-metric. Unsupervised categorization by identifying a subset of representative exemplars can be efficiently performed with the recently-proposed 'affinity propagation' algorithm. In contrast to k-centers clustering, which iteratively refines an initial randomly-chosen set of exemplars, affinity propagation simultaneously considers all data points as potential exemplars and iteratively exchanges messages between data points until a good solution emerges. When applied to the Olivetti face data set using a translation-invariant non-metric similarity, affinity propagation achieves a much lower reconstruction error and nearly halves the classification error rate, compared to state-of-the-art techniques. For the more challenging problem of unsupervised categorization of images from the CaltechlOl data set, we derived non-metric similarities between pairs of images by matching SIFT features. Affinity propagation successfully identifies meaningful categories, which provide a natural summarization of the training images and can be used to classify new input images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Cited by
Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks
Rodriguez, A., & Laio, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242072 · Cited by 4,942
Machine learning for medical imaging
Erickson, B. J., Korfiatis, P., Akkus, Z., & Kline, T. L. (2017) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.2017160130 · Cited by 1,672
Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy
Skoulidis, F., & Heymach, J. V. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0179-8 · Cited by 1,019
Streaming submodular maximization: massive data summarization on the fly
Badanidiyuru, A., Mirzasoleiman, B., Karbasi, A., & Krause, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623637 · Cited by 300
Non-maximum Suppression for Object Detection by Passing Messages Between Windows
Rothe, R., Guillaumin, M., & Van Gool, L. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16865-4_19 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Dueck, D., & Frey, B. J.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2130623086
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-metric affinity propagation for unsupervised image categorization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408853
- The paper
- Dueck, D., & Frey, B. J. (2007). Non-metric affinity propagation for unsupervised image categorization. 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.