The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning The Discriminative Power-Invariance Trade-Off
Abstract
We investigate the problem of learning optimal descriptors for a given classification task. Many hand-crafted descriptors have been proposed in the literature for measuring visual similarity. Looking past initial differences, what really distinguishes one descriptor from another is the tradeoff that it achieves between discriminative power and invariance. Since this trade-off must vary from task to task, no single descriptor can be optimal in all situations. Our focus, in this paper, is on learning the optimal tradeoff for classification given a particular training set and prior constraints. The problem is posed in the kernel learning framework. We learn the optimal, domain-specific kernel as a combination of base kernels corresponding to base features which achieve different levels of trade-off (such as no invariance, rotation invariance, scale invariance, affine invariance, etc.) This leads to a convex optimisation problem with a unique global optimum which can be solved for efficiently. The method is shown to achieve state-of-the-art performance on the UIUC textures, Oxford flowers and Cal- tech 101 datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.188 · Cited by 6,723
Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm
Bach, F. R., Lanckriet, G. R. G., & Jordan, M. I. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015424 · Cited by 1,453
Cited by
Automated Flower Classification over a Large Number of Classes
Nilsback, M.-E., & Zisserman, A. (2008) · 2008 Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icvgip.2008.47 · Cited by 3,442
Adapting visual category models to new domains
Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., & Darrell, T. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15561-1_16 · Cited by 2,847
Lee, H., Grosse, R., Ranganath, R., & Ng, A. Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553453 · Cited by 2,412
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Parkhi, O. M., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A., & Jawahar, C. V. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248092 · Cited by 1,533
Metadata
- Authors
- Varma, M., & Ray, D.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2122808326
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 46.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning The Discriminative Power-Invariance Trade-Off. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408875
- The paper
- Varma, M., & Ray, D. (2007). Learning The Discriminative Power-Invariance Trade-Off. 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
