The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is that you? Metric learning approaches for face identification
Open accessAbstract
Face identification is the problem of determining whether two face images depict the same person or not. This is difficult due to variations in scale, pose, lighting, background, expression, hairstyle, and glasses. In this paper we present two methods for learning robust distance measures: (a) a logistic discriminant approach which learns the metric from a set of labelled image pairs (LDML) and (b) a nearest neighbour approach which computes the probability for two images to belong to the same class (MkNN). We evaluate our approaches on the Labeled Faces in the Wild data set, a large and very challenging data set of faces from Yahoo! News. The evaluation protocol for this data set defines a restricted setting, where a fixed set of positive and negative image pairs is given, as well as an unrestricted one, where faces are labelled by their identity. We are the first to present results for the unrestricted setting, and show that our methods benefit from this richer training data, much more so than the current state-of-the-art method. Our results of 79.3% and 87.5% correct for the restricted and unrestricted setting respectively, significantly improve over the current state-of-the-art result of 78.5%. Confidence scores obtained for face identification can be used for many applications e.g. clustering or recognition from a single training example. We show that our learned metrics also improve performance for these tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
Cited by
Person re-identification by Local Maximal Occurrence representation and metric learning
Liao, S., Hu, Y., Zhu, X., & Li, S. Z. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298832 · Cited by 2,091
Deep Learning Face Representation by Joint Identification-Verification
Sun, Y., Wang, X., & Tang, X. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.4773 · Cited by 1,906
Face recognition in unconstrained videos with matched background similarity
Wolf, L., Hassner, T., & Maoz, I. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995566 · Cited by 1,382
An improved deep learning architecture for person re-identification
Ahmed, E., Jones, M., & Marks, T. K. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299016 · Cited by 1,248
Chen, D., Cao, X., Wen, F., & Sun, J. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.389 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillaumin, M., Verbeek, J., & Schmid, C.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-09
- Pages
- 498-505
- OpenAlex
- W2109824782
- Cited by
- 757
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is that you? Metric learning approaches for face identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459197
- The paper
- Guillaumin, M., Verbeek, J., & Schmid, C. (2009). Is that you? Metric learning approaches for face identification. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.