The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TagProp: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation
Open accessAbstract
Image auto-annotation is an important open problem in computer vision. For this task we propose TagProp, a discriminatively trained nearest neighbor model. Tags of test images are predicted using a weighted nearest-neighbor model to exploit labeled training images. Neighbor weights are based on neighbor rank or distance. TagProp allows the integration of metric learning by directly maximizing the log-likelihood of the tag predictions in the training set. In this manner, we can optimally combine a collection of image similarity metrics that cover different aspects of image content, such as local shape descriptors, or global color histograms. We also introduce a word specific sigmoidal modulation of the weighted neighbor tag predictions to boost the recall of rare words. We investigate the performance of different variants of our model and compare to existing work. We present experimental results for three challenging data sets. On all three, TagProp makes a marked improvement as compared to the current state-of-the-art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
Self-citation
Cited by
CNN-RNN: A Unified Framework for Multi-label Image Classification
Wang, J., Yang, Y., Mao, J., Huang, Z., Huang, C., & Xu, W. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.251 · Cited by 1,198
Is object localization for free? - Weakly-supervised learning with convolutional neural networks
Oquab, M., Bottou, L., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298668 · Cited by 886
Deep Learning for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification
Liu, J., Chang, W.-C., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3077136.3080834 · Cited by 676
A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Data
Bellet, A., Habrard, A., & Sebban, M. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.6709 · Cited by 494
Distance-Based Image Classification: Generalizing to New Classes at Near-Zero Cost
Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., & Csurka, G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.83 · Cited by 431
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillaumin, M., Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., & Schmid, C.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-09
- Pages
- 309-316
- OpenAlex
- W2536305071
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TagProp: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459266
- The paper
- Guillaumin, M., Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., & Schmid, C. (2009). TagProp: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.