The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Articulated part-based model for joint object detection and pose estimation
Abstract
Despite recent successes, pose estimators are still somewhat fragile, and they frequently rely on a precise knowledge of the location of the object. Unfortunately, articulated objects are also very difficult to detect. Knowledge about the articulated nature of these objects, however, can substantially contribute to the task of finding them in an image. It is somewhat surprising, that these two tasks are usually treated entirely separately. In this paper, we propose an Articulated Part-based Model (APM) for jointly detecting objects and estimating their poses. APM recursively represents an object as a collection of parts at multiple levels of detail, from coarse-to-fine, where parts at every level are connected to a coarser level through a parent-child relationship (Fig. 1(b)-Horizontal). Parts are further grouped into part-types (e.g., left-facing head, long stretching arm, etc) so as to model appearance variations (Fig. 1(b)-Vertical). By having the ability to share appearance models of part types and by decomposing complex poses into parent-child pairwise relationships, APM strikes a good balance between model complexity and model richness. Extensive quantitative and qualitative experiment results on public datasets show that APM outperforms state-of-the-art methods. We also show results on PASCAL 2007 - cats and dogs - two highly challenging articulated object categories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Cited by
Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields
Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., & Sheikh, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.143 · Cited by 7,539
“A common approach [28, 11, 33, 16] is to divide and conquer the problem by employing a person detector and performing single-person pose estimation for each detection.”
BackgroundMethodOpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields
Cao, Z., Hidalgo, G., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., & Sheikh, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2929257 · Cited by 5,536
Wei, S.-E., Ramakrishna, V., Kanade, T., & Sheikh, Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.511 · Cited by 2,966
Articulated Human Detection with Flexible Mixtures of Parts
Yang, Y., & Ramanan, D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.261 · Cited by 852
Detect What You Can: Detecting and Representing Objects Using Holistic Models and Body Parts
Chen, X., Mottaghi, R., Liu, X., Fidler, S., Urtasun, R., & Yuille, A. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.254 · Cited by 605
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, M., & Savarese, S.
- Venue
- 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-11
- Pages
- 723-730
- OpenAlex
- W1993149133
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Articulated part-based model for joint object detection and pose estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126309
- The paper
- Sun, M., & Savarese, S. (2011). Articulated part-based model for joint object detection and pose estimation. 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.