The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Centralized sparse representation for image restoration
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel sparse representation model called centralized sparse representation (CSR) for image restoration tasks. In order for faithful image reconstruction, it is expected that the sparse coding coefficients of the degraded image should be as close as possible to those of the unknown original image with the given dictionary. However, since the available data are the degraded (noisy, blurred and/or down-sampled) versions of the original image, the sparse coding coefficients are often not accurate enough if only the local sparsity of the image is considered, as in many existing sparse representation models. To make the sparse coding more accurate, a centralized sparsity constraint is introduced by exploiting the nonlocal image statistics. The local sparsity and the nonlocal sparsity constraints are unified into a variational framework for optimization. Extensive experiments on image restoration validated that our CSR model achieves convincing improvement over previous state-of-the-art methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00169-7 · Cited by 3,642
Sparse Representation for Color Image Restoration
Mairal, J., Elad, M., & Sapiro, G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.911828 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising
Gu, S., Zhang, L., Zuo, W., & Feng, X. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.366 · Cited by 2,316
Nonlocally Centralized Sparse Representation for Image Restoration
Dong, W., Zhang, L., Shi, G., & Li, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2235847 · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationDeep Network Cascade for Image Super-resolution
Cui, Z., Chang, H., Shan, S., Zhong, B., & Chen, X. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_4 · Cited by 255
Zhang, K., Zhou, X., Zhang, H., & Zuo, W. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24075-6_65 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, W., Zhang, L., & Shi, G.
- Venue
- 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-11
- Pages
- 1259-1266
- OpenAlex
- W2151452149
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Centralized sparse representation for image restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126377
- The paper
- Dong, W., Zhang, L., & Shi, G. (2011). Centralized sparse representation for image restoration. 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.