The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning cross-modality similarity for multinomial data
Abstract
Many applications involve multiple-modalities such as text and images that describe the problem of interest. In order to leverage the information present in all the modalities, one must model the relationships between them. While some techniques have been proposed to tackle this problem, they either are restricted to words describing visual objects only, or require full correspondences between the different modalities. As a consequence, they are unable to tackle more realistic scenarios where a narrative text is only loosely related to an image, and where only a few image-text pairs are available. In this paper, we propose a model that addresses both these challenges. Our model can be seen as a Markov random field of topic models, which connects the documents based on their similarity. As a consequence, the topics learned with our model are shared across connected documents, thus encoding the relations between different modalities. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model for image retrieval from a loosely related text.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Adapting visual category models to new domains
Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., & Darrell, T. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15561-1_16 · Cited by 2,847
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · Cited by 4,902
Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2598339 · Cited by 1,048
What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?
Wu, Q., Shen, C., Liu, L., Dick, A., & Van Den Hengel, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.29 · Cited by 452
An Overview of Cross-Media Retrieval: Concepts, Methodologies, Benchmarks, and Challenges
Peng, Y., Huang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2017.2705068 · Cited by 341
Learning Aligned Cross-Modal Representations from Weakly Aligned Data
Castrejon, L., Aytar, Y., Vondrick, C., Pirsiavash, H., & Torralba, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.321 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, Y., Salzmann, M., & Darrell, T.
- Venue
- 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-11
- Pages
- 2407-2414
- OpenAlex
- W2115752676
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning cross-modality similarity for multinomial data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126524
- The paper
- Jia, Y., Salzmann, M., & Darrell, T. (2011). Learning cross-modality similarity for multinomial data. 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.