The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Need for Speed: A Benchmark for Higher Frame Rate Object Tracking
Abstract
In this paper, we propose the first higher frame rate video dataset (called Need for Speed - NfS) and benchmark for visual object tracking. The dataset consists of 100 videos (380K frames) captured with now commonly available higher frame rate (240 FPS) cameras from real world scenarios. All frames are annotated with axis aligned bounding boxes and all sequences are manually labelled with nine visual attributes - such as occlusion, fast motion, background clutter, etc. Our benchmark provides an extensive evaluation of many recent and state-of-the-art trackers on higher frame rate sequences. We ranked each of these trackers according to their tracking accuracy and real-time performance. One of our surprising conclusions is that at higher frame rates, simple trackers such as correlation filters outperform complex methods based on deep networks. This suggests that for practical applications (such as in robotics or embedded vision), one needs to carefully tradeoff bandwidth constraints associated with higher frame rate acquisition, computational costs of real-time analysis, and the required application accuracy. Our dataset and benchmark allows for the first time (to our knowledge) systematic exploration of such issues, and will be made available to allow for further research in this space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
High-Speed Tracking with Kernelized Correlation Filters
Henriques, J. F., Caseiro, R., Martins, P., & Batista, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2345390 · Cited by 5,753
Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Tracking
Bertinetto, L., Valmadre, J., Henriques, J. F., Vedaldi, A., & Torr, P. H. S. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48881-3_56 · Cited by 4,546
Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.312 · Cited by 4,138
Visual object tracking using adaptive correlation filters
Bolme, D., Beveridge, J. R., Draper, B. A., & Lui, Y. M. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539960 · Cited by 3,406
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2388226 · Cited by 3,371 · cited 8×
“However, most of these algorithms - and the datasets they have been evaluated upon [38, 37, 23] - have been aimed at the canonical approximate frame rate of 30 Frames Per Second (FPS).”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning Multi-domain Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Tracking
Nam, H., & Han, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.465 · Cited by 2,806
Accurate Scale Estimation for Robust Visual Tracking
Danelljan, M., Häger, G., Shahbaz Khan, F., & Felsberg, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014 · doi:10.5244/c.28.65 · Cited by 2,087
Cited by
GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wild
Huang, L., Zhao, X., & Huang, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2957464 · Cited by 1,809
LaSOT: A High-Quality Benchmark for Large-Scale Single Object Tracking
Fan, H., Lin, L., Yang, F., Chu, P., Deng, G., Yu, S., Bai, H., Xu, Y., Liao, C., & Ling, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00552 · Cited by 1,742
“NfS [14] provides 100 sequences with a high framerate of 240 fps, aiming to analyze the effects of appearance variations on tracking performance.”
BackgroundInfluentialATOM: Accurate Tracking by Overlap Maximization
Danelljan, M., Bhat, G., Khan, F. S., & Felsberg, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00479 · Cited by 1,591
Learning Discriminative Model Prediction for Tracking
Bhat, G., Danelljan, M., Van Gool, L., & Timofte, R. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00628 · Cited by 1,515
Chen, X., Yan, B., Zhu, J., Wang, D., Yang, X., & Lu, H. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00803 · Cited by 1,588
Metadata
- Authors
- Galoogahi, H. K., Fagg, A., Huang, C., Ramanan, D., & Lucey, S.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-10
- Pages
- 1134-1143
- OpenAlex
- W2605173812
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Need for Speed: A Benchmark for Higher Frame Rate Object Tracking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2017.128
- The paper
- Galoogahi, H. K., Fagg, A., Huang, C., Ramanan, D., & Lucey, S. (2017). Need for Speed: A Benchmark for Higher Frame Rate Object Tracking. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2017.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
