Cited by 729Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flow-Guided Feature Aggregation for Video Object Detection

Open access
Zhu, Xizhou, Wang, Yujie, Dai, Jifeng, Yuan, Lu, Wei, Yichen·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Extending state-of-the-art object detectors from image to video is challenging. The accuracy of detection suffers from degenerated object appearances in videos, e.g., motion blur, video defocus, rare poses, etc. Existing work attempts to exploit temporal information on box level, but such methods are not trained end-to-end. We present flow-guided feature aggregation, an accurate and end-to-end learning framework for video object detection. It leverages temporal coherence on feature level instead. It improves the per-frame features by aggregation of nearby features along the motion paths, and thus improves the video recognition accuracy. Our method significantly improves upon strong singleframe baselines in ImageNet VID [33], especially for more challenging fast moving objects. Our framework is principled, and on par with the best engineered systems winning the ImageNet VID challenges 2016, without additional bells-and-whistles. The code would be released.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2017.52

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. yang, 2016, Efficient object detection from videos
  2. tran, 2016, Deep end2end voxe12voxel prediction, CVPR Workshop

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Simple Baselines for Human Pose Estimation and Tracking

    Xiao, B., Wu, H., & Wei, Y. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01231-1_29 · Cited by 2,278

    “d occlusion introduced by video frames. As shown in Fig. 2(c), the detector misses the left black person due to fast motion. Temporal information is often leveraged to generate more robust detections [36,35]. We propose to generate boxes for the processing frame from nearby frames using temporal information expressed…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation
  • TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understanding

    Lin, J., Gan, C., & Han, S. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00718 · Cited by 2,209

    “We also compare to a strong baseline FGFA [60] that uses optical flow to aggregate the temporal information from 21 frames (past 10 frames and future 10 frames) for offline video detection.”
    Method
  • Tracking Objects as Points

    Zhou, X., Koltun, V., & Krähenbühl, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58548-8_28 · Cited by 1,428

    “posals using bounding box regression. In video object detection, Kang et al. [16,17] feed stacked consecutive frames into the network and do object detection for a whole video segment. And Zhu et al. [59] use flow to warp intermediate features from previous frames to accelerate inference. Our method belongs to this cat…”
    Method
  • Video Enhancement with Task-Oriented Flow

    Xue, T., Chen, B., Wu, J., Wei, D., & Freeman, W. T. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-018-01144-2 · Cited by 1,401

    “…(Liu et al 2017), light-field interpolation (Wang et al 2017), novel view synthesis (Zhou et al 2016), eye gaze manipulation (Ganin et al 2016), object detection (Zhu et al 2017), denoising (Wen et al 2017), and super-resolution (Caballero et al 2017; Tao et al 2017; Makansi et al 2017).”
  • A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Object Detection

    Jiao, L., Zhang, F., Liu, F., Yang, S., Li, L., Feng, Z., & Qu, R. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939201 · Cited by 1,454

    “Video detectors [266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273][274][275] exploit temporal contexts to meet this challenge.”
    Background

See all 729

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, X., Wang, Y., Dai, J., Yuan, L., & Wei, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-10
Pages
408-417
OpenAlex
W2964286567
Cited by
729
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 4
FWCI
17.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
video object detection, optical flow, temporal feature aggregation, movement paths, end-to-end learning, motion blur, fast-moving objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review