The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherent Semantic Attention for Image Inpainting
Open accessAbstract
The latest deep learning-based approaches have shown promising results for the challenging task of inpainting missing regions of an image. However, the existing methods often generate contents with blurry textures and distorted structures due to the discontinuity of the local pixels. From a semantic-level perspective, the local pixel discontinuity is mainly because these methods ignore the semantic relevance and feature continuity of hole regions. To handle this problem, we investigate the human behavior in repairing pictures and propose a fined deep generative model-based approach with a novel coherent semantic attention (CSA) layer, which can not only preserve contextual structure but also make more effective predictions of missing parts by modeling the semantic relevance between the holes features. The task is divided into rough, refinement as two steps and we model each step with a neural network under the U-Net architecture, where the CSA layer is embedded into the encoder of refinement step. Meanwhile, we further propose consistency loss and feature patch discriminator to stabilize the network training process and improve the details. The experiments on CelebA, Places2, and Paris StreetView datasets have validated the effectiveness of our proposed methods in image inpainting tasks and can obtain images with a higher quality as compared with the existing state-of-the-art approaches. The codes and pre-trained models will be available at https://github.com/KumapowerLIU/CSA-inpainting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks
Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.632 · Cited by 22,930
Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting
Pathak, D., Krahenbuhl, P., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Efros, A. A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.278 · Cited by 5,691
Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Criminisi, A., Perez, P., & Toyama, K. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2004.833105 · Cited by 3,258 · cited 1×
“Non-learning approaches such as [11, 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 15, 2, 32, 18, 34, 28, 12, 29] fill in missing regions by propagating neighboring information or copying information from similar patch of the background.”
BackgroundImage Inpainting for Irregular Holes Using Partial Convolutions
Liu, G., Reda, F. A., Shih, K. J., Wang, T.-C., Tao, A., & Catanzaro, B. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01252-6_6 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 12×
“For irregular mask, as shown in Fig 7, PC [23] and GC [39] can get smooth and plausible result, but the continuities in color and rows do not hold well and some artifacts can still be observed on generated images.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- yu, 2018, Free-form image inpainting with gated convolution, arXiv preprint arXiv 1806 03589
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.728 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5244/C.19.52 · DOI
- 10.1145/1073204.1073274 · DOI · Paper page
- song, 2018, Spg-net: Segmentation prediction and guidance network for image inpainting, BMVC
- song, 2018, Contextual-based image inpainting: Infer, match, and translate, ECCV
- yang, 2018, Image inpainting using block-wise procedural training with annealed adversarial counterpart, arXiv preprint arXiv 1803 08943
- yang, 2017, High-resolution image inpainting using multiscale neural patch synthesis, CVPR
- yan, 2018, Shift-net: Image inpainting via deep feature rearrangement, ECCV
- 10.1109/TIP.2010.2042098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00577 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/383259.383296 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0956792502004904 · DOI · Paper page
- goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial networks NIPS
- 10.1145/2601097.2601205 · DOI · Paper page
- iddo, 2003, Fragment-based image completion, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 22, 303, 10.1145/882262.882267 · DOI · Paper page
- iizuka, 2017, Globally and locally consistent image completion, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36, 10.1145/3072959.3073659 · DOI · Paper page
- joachim, 1999, Coherence-enhancing diffusion filtering, International Journal of Computer Vision, 31, 111, 10.1023/A:1008009714131 · DOI · Paper page
- johnson, 2016, Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution, ECCV
- 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587842 · DOI · Paper page
- barnes, 2009, Patchmatch: A randomized correspondence algorithm forstructural image editing, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 28, 10.1145/1531326.1531330 · DOI · Paper page
- yeh, 2016, Semantic image inpainting with perceptual and contextual losses, arXiv preprint arXiv 1607 07539
- 10.1109/83.935036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIP.2003.815261 · DOI · Paper page
- soheil, 2012, Image melding: Combining inconsistent images using patch-based synthesis, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31
- bertalmio, 2000, Image Inpainting the Proceeding SIGGRAPH
- carl, 2012, What makes paris look like paris?, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31
- brian dolhansky, 2018, Eye in-painting with exemplar generative adversarial networks CVPR
- anat, 2003, Learning how to inpaint from global image statistics ICCV
- efros alexei, 2001, Texture Synthesis by Nonparametric Sampling
- jolicoeur-martineau, 2018, The relativistic discriminator: a key element missing from standard gan, arXiv preprint arXiv 1807 00734
- li, 2017, Generative Face Completion CVPR
- li, 2016, Precomputed real-time texture synthesis with markovian generative adversarial networks
- zhao, 2018, Guided image inpainting: Replacing an image region by pulling content from another image, arXiv preprint arXiv 1803 08435
- liu, 2015, Deep learning face attributes in the wild
- zhang, 2018, Semantic image inpainting with progressive generative networks MM
- zhou, 2015, Places: A 10 million image database for scene recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- park, 2018, Srfeat: Single image super-resolution with feature discrimination, ECCV
Cited by
Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutions
Suvorov, R., Logacheva, E., Mashikhin, A., Remizova, A., Ashukha, A., Silvestrov, A., Kong, N., Goka, H., Park, K., & Lempitsky, V. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00323 · Cited by 1,123
Large Scale Image Completion via Co-Modulated Generative Adversarial Networks
Zhao, S., Cui, J., Sheng, Y., Dong, Y., Liang, X., Chang, E. I., & Xu, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10428 · Cited by 224
Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon
Juefei-Xu, F., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Guo, Q., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01606-8 · Cited by 191
“Considering that the specific editing task is only related to the changed attributes instead of all target attributes, as an improvement of AttGAN, STGAN (Liu et al., 2019) has selectively taken the difference between target and source attribute vectors as the input of the model.”
MethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Jiang, B., Xiao, Y., & Yang, C.
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 4169-4178
- OpenAlex
- W2989207674
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.