Cited by 408Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Learning With Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval With a Listwise Loss

Open access
Revaud, Jerome, Almazan, Jon, Rezende, Rafael, Souza, Cesar De·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Image retrieval can be formulated as a ranking problem where the goal is to order database images by decreasing similarity to the query. Recent deep models for image retrieval have outperformed traditional methods by leveraging ranking-tailored loss functions, but important theoretical and practical problems remain. First, rather than directly optimizing the global ranking, they minimize an upper-bound on the essential loss, which does not necessarily result in an optimal mean average precision (mAP). Second, these methods require significant engineering efforts to work well, e.g., special pre-training and hard-negative mining. In this paper we propose instead to directly optimize the global mAP by leveraging recent advances in listwise loss formulations. Using a histogram binning approximation, the AP can be differentiated and thus employed to end-to-end learning. Compared to existing losses, the proposed method considers thousands of images simultaneously at each iteration and eliminates the need for ad hoc tricks. It also establishes a new state of the art on many standard retrieval benchmarks. Models and evaluation scripts have been made available at: https://europe.naverlabs.com/Deep-Image-Retrieval/.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00521

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For ViT architectures, self-supervised pretraining transfers better than features trained with supervision.

    “We observe that for ViT architectures, self-supervised pretraining transfers better than features trained with supervision, which is consistent with observations made on convolutional networks [10, 33, 62].”

    From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Revaud, J., Almazan, J., Rezende, R., & Souza, C. D.
Affiliations
NAVER Cloud (South Korea) (KR)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
5106-5115
OpenAlex
W2949845221
Cited by
408
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 5
FWCI
15.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
image retrieval, mean average precision, differentiable loss, end-to-end learning, hard negative mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review