Auto-FPN: Automatic Network Architecture Adaptation for Object Detection Beyond Classification
Abstract
Neural architecture search (NAS) has shown great potential in automating the manual process of designing a good CNN architecture for image classification. In this paper, we study NAS for object detection, a core computer vision task that classifies and localizes object instances in an image. Existing works focus on transferring the searched architecture from classification task (ImageNet) to the detector backbone, while the rest of the architecture of the detector remains unchanged. However, this pipeline is not task-specific or data-oriented network search which cannot guarantee optimal adaptation to any dataset. Therefore, we propose an architecture search framework named Auto-FPN specifically designed for detection beyond simply searching a classification backbone. Specifically, we propose two auto search modules for detection: Auto-fusion to search a better fusion of the multi-level features; Auto-head to search a better structure for classification and bounding-box(bbox) regression. Instead of searching for one repeatable cell structure, we relax the constraint and allow different cells. The search space of both modules covers many popular designs of detectors and allows efficient gradient-based architecture search with resource constraint (2 days for COCO on 8 GPU cards). Extensive experiments on Pascal VOC, COCO, BDD, VisualGenome and ADE demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, e.g. achieving around 5% improvement than FPN in terms of mAP while requiring around 50% fewer parameters on the searched modules.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When designing a detection model, NAS can reduce the need for human intervention on the design of the network backbone and anchor boxes.
“When designing a detection model, NAS can reduce the need for human intervention on the design of the network backbone and anchor boxes [149-155].”
From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [150]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Xu, A., Yao, A., Li, A., Liang, A., & Zhang, A.
- Affiliations
- Huawei Noah's Ark Lab
- Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 6648-6657
- OpenAlex
- W2985228975
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- neural architecture search, object detection, feature fusion, bounding box regression, multi-level feature fusion, lightweight detectors, Pascal VOC, COCO, BDD, ADE20K
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review