Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attributing Fake Images to GANs: Learning and Analyzing GAN Fingerprints

Yu, Ning, Davis, Larry, Fritz, Mario·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Recent advances in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown increasing success in generating photorealistic images. But they also raise challenges to visual forensics and model attribution. We present the first study of learning GAN fingerprints towards image attribution and using them to classify an image as real or GAN-generated. For GAN-generated images, we further identify their sources. Our experiments show that (1) GANs carry distinct model fingerprints and leave stable fingerprints in their generated images, which support image attribution; (2) even minor differences in GAN training can result in different fingerprints, which enables fine-grained model authentication; (3) fingerprints persist across different image frequencies and patches and are not biased by GAN artifacts; (4) fingerprint finetuning is effective in immunizing against five types of adversarial image perturbations; and (5) comparisons also show our learned fingerprints consistently outperform several baselines in a variety of setups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00765

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. karras, 2018, Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation, International Conference on Learning Representations
  2. fridrich, 2012, Digital Image Forensics There is More to a Picture than Meets the Eye
  3. 0, How to recognize fake ai-generated images
  4. 0, Deep fakes How they are made and how they can be detected
  5. bau, 2019, Visualizing and understanding generative adversarial networks, International Conference on Learning Representations
  6. bergmann, 2017, Learning texture manifolds with the periodic spatial gan, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 70, 469
  7. bi?kowski, 2018, Demystifying MMD GANs, International Conference on Learning Representations
  8. 0, Model gallery
  9. 0, In the age of a i is seeing still believing?
  10. 0, You thought fake news was bad? Deep fakes are where truth goes to die
  11. 0, The value of stolen data on the dark web

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Yu, N., Davis, L., & Fritz, M.
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
7555-7565
OpenAlex
W2991318208
Cited by
437
References
69
FWCI
13.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributing Fake Images to GANs: Learning and Analyzing GAN Fingerprints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2019.00765
The paper
Yu, N., Davis, L., & Fritz, M. (2019). Attributing Fake Images to GANs: Learning and Analyzing GAN Fingerprints. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2019.00765

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.