The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Objects365: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Dataset for Object Detection
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a new large-scale object detection dataset, Objects365, which has 365 object categories over 600K training images. More than 10 million, high-quality bounding boxes are manually labeled through a three-step, carefully designed annotation pipeline. It is the largest object detection dataset (with full annotation) so far and establishes a more challenging benchmark for the community. Objects365 can serve as a better feature learning dataset for localization-sensitive tasks like object detection and semantic segmentation. The Objects365 pre-trained models significantly outperform ImageNet pre-trained models with 5.6 points gain (42 vs 36.4) based on the standard setting of 90K iterations on COCO benchmark. Even compared with much long training time like 540K iterations, our Objects365 pretrained model with 90K iterations still have 2.7 points gain (42 vs 39.3). Meanwhile, the finetuning time can be greatly reduced (up to 10 times) when reaching the same accuracy. Better generalization ability of Object365 has also been verified on CityPersons, VOC segmentation, and ADE tasks. The dataset as well as the pretrained-models have been released at www.objects365.org.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Existing large DETR models [3, 6, 32, 41, 44, 46] have demonstrated impressive performance on COCO test-dev [20] leaderboard.”
From DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, DINO achieves the SOTA result with a publicly available SwinL [23] backbone and a public dataset Objects365 [33] (1.7M annotated images) only.”
From DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Self-citationFaster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Self-citationFaster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
Self-citationImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684
(2016) · Cited by 31,590
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- girshick, 2018, Detectron
- he, 2018, Rethinking im-agenet pre-training, arXiv preprint arXiv 1811 08883
- everingham, 0, The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2012 (VOC2012) Results
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection
Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01605 · Cited by 5,020
“After pre-training with Objects365 [32], RT-DETR-R50 / R101 achieves 55 .”
Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey
Zou, Z., Chen, K., Shi, Z., Guo, Y., & Ye, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3238524 · Cited by 3,689
“, ILSVRC2014) [56], MS-COCO Detection Challenge [57], Open Images Dataset [58, 59], Objects365 [60], etc.”
A Comprehensive Review of YOLO Architectures in Computer Vision: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAS
Terven, J. R., Esparza, D. M. C., & Romero-González, J.-A. (2023) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make5040083 · Cited by 4,118
“The model is pre-trained on Objects365 [126], which contains two million images and 365 categories, then the COCO dataset was used to generate pseudo-labels.”
MethodSwin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution
Liu, Z., Hu, H., Lin, Y., Yao, Z., Xie, Z., Wei, Y., Ning, J., Cao, Y., Zhang, Z., Dong, L., et al. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01170 · Cited by 2,985
“For our largest model experiments, we employ an additional detection pre-training phase using Object 365 v2 dataset [59], in-between the image classification pre-training phase and the COCO fine-tuning phase.”
MethodSwin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution
Liu, Z., Hu, H., Lin, Y., Yao, Z., Xie, Z., Wei, Y., Ning, J., Cao, Y., Zhang, Z., Dong, L., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.09883 · Cited by 2,679
“For our largest model experiments, we employ an additional detection pre-training phase using Object 365 v2 dataset [59], in-between the image classification pre-training phase and the COCO fine-tuning phase.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, S., Li, Z., Zhang, T., Peng, C., Yu, G., Zhang, X., Li, J., & Sun, J.
- Affiliations
- Megvii (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 8429-8438
- OpenAlex
- W2983943451
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- bounding box annotation, annotation pipeline, pre-trained models, representation learning, semantic segmentation, benchmark, COCO benchmark, CityPersons, ADE20K
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
