The Right to Talk: An Audio-Visual Transformer Approach
Open accessAbstract
Turn-taking has played an essential role in structuring the regulation of a conversation. The task of identifying the main speaker (who is properly taking his/her turn of speaking) and the interrupters (who are interrupting or reacting to the main speaker’s utterances) remains a challenging task. Although some prior methods have partially addressed this task, there still remain some limitations. Firstly, a direct association of Audio and Visual features may limit the correlations to be extracted due to different modalities. Secondly, the relationship across temporal segments helping to maintain the consistency of localization, separation and conversation contexts is not effectively exploited. Finally, the interactions between speakers that usually contain the tracking and anticipatory decisions about transition to a new speaker is usually ignored. Therefore, this work introduces a new Audio-Visual Transformer approach to the problem of localization and highlighting the main speaker in both audio and visual channels of a multi-speaker conversation video in the wild. The proposed method exploits different types of correlations presented in both visual and audio signals. The temporal audio-visual relationships across spatial-temporal space are anticipated and optimized via the self-attention mechanism in a Transformer structure. Moreover, a newly collected dataset is introduced for the main speaker detection. To the best of our knowledge, it is one of the first studies that is able to automatically localize and highlight the main speaker in both visual and audio channels in multi-speaker conversation videos.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multi-task training (by adding auxiliary loss) and adversarial training improve multimodal pretraining Transformers to further boost performance.
“Some practices demonstrate that multi-task training (by adding auxiliary loss) [111], [137] and adversarial training [210] improve multimodal pretraining Transformers to further boost the performance.”
From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [111]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [2][2] T. Afouras, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman. The conversation: Deep audio-visual speech enhancement. In INTERSPEECH, 2018.
- [4][4] Triantafyllos Afouras, Joon Son Chung, and Andrew Zisser- man. My lips are concealed: Audio-visual speech enhance- ment through obstructions. In INTERSPEECH, 2019.
- [11][11] Punarjay Chakravarty and Tinne Tuytelaars. Cross-modal supervision for learning active speaker detection in video. In ECCV, 2016.
- [24][24] Chi Nhan Duong, Kha Gia Quach, Khoa Luu, Hoai Bac Le, and Karl Ricanek Jr. Fine tuning age estimation with global and local facial features. In ICASSP, 2011.
- [33][33] Ruohan Gao and Kristen Grauman. 2.5 d visual sound. In CVPR, 2019.
- [36][36] Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Gir- shick. Mask r-cnn. In ICCV, 2017.
- [37][37] J Hershey and JR Movellan. Audio-vision: Locating sounds via audio-visual synchrony. NIPS, 1999.
- [58][58] Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In NIPS, 2019.
- [67][67] Vayer Titouan, Rémi Flamary, Nicolas Courty, Romain Tave- nard, and Laetitia Chapel. Sliced gromov-wasserstein. In NIPS. 2019.
- Authors
- Truong, T.-D., Duong, C. N., De Vu, T., Pham, H. A., Raj, B., Le, N., & Luu, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
- Concordia University (CA)
- VinAI Research
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-10
- Pages
- 1085-1094
- OpenAlex
- W3191488649
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Funders
- Arkansas Biosciences Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- turn-taking, speaker localization, speaker tracking, self-attention, audio-visual correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review