A General Recurrent Tracking Framework without Real Data
Abstract
Recent progress in multi-object tracking (MOT) has shown great significance of a robust scoring mechanism for potential tracks. However, the lack of available data in MOT makes it difficult to learn a general scoring mechanism. Multiple cues including appearance, motion and etc., are limitedly utilized in current manual scoring functions. In this paper, we propose a Multiple Nodes Tracking (MNT) framework that adapts to most trackers. Based on this framework, a Recurrent Tracking Unit (RTU) is designed to score potential tracks through long-term information. In addition, we present a method of generating simulated tracking data without real data to overcome the defect of limited available data in MOT. The experiments demonstrate that our simulated tracking data is effective for training RTU and achieves state-of-the-art performance on both MOT17 and MOT16 benchmarks. Meanwhile, RTU can be flexibly plugged into classic trackers such as DeepSORT and MHT, and makes remarkable improvements as well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only methods [50,53,54] that follow [66] and pretrain on 6 additional tracking datasets (6M) surpass TrackFormer's performance on MOT17 private detections.
“Only [50,53,54] which follow [66] and pretrain on 6 additional tracking datasets (6M) surpass our performance.”
From TrackFormer: Multi-Object Tracking with Transformers (2022) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited
Kim, C., Li, F., Ciptadi, A., & Rehg, J. M. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.533 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
TubeTK: Adopting Tubes to Track Multi-Object in a One-Step Training Model
Pang, B., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, M., & Lu, C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00634 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Observation-Centric SORT: Rethinking SORT for Robust Multi-Object Tracking
Cao, J., Pang, J., Weng, X., Khirodkar, R., & Kitani, K. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00934 · Cited by 1,115 · see citing works
TrackFormer: Multi-Object Tracking with Transformers
Meinhardt, T., Kirillov, A., Leal-Taixe, L., & Feichtenhofer, C. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00864 · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
“9 1032 405 28998 115104 3699 GRTU [53] CH+6M – 75.”
Method
- Authors
- Wang, S., Sheng, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., & Xiong, Z.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment (CN)
- Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-10
- Pages
- 13199-13208
- OpenAlex
- W3202977309
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Science and Technology Development Fund
- State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- multi-target tracking, limited training data, DeepSORT, MOT17, MOT16
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review