Cited by 70Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

A General Recurrent Tracking Framework without Real Data

Wang, Shuai, Sheng, Hao, Zhang, Yang, Wu, Yubin, Xiong, Zhang·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Recent progress in multi-object tracking (MOT) has shown great significance of a robust scoring mechanism for potential tracks. However, the lack of available data in MOT makes it difficult to learn a general scoring mechanism. Multiple cues including appearance, motion and etc., are limitedly utilized in current manual scoring functions. In this paper, we propose a Multiple Nodes Tracking (MNT) framework that adapts to most trackers. Based on this framework, a Recurrent Tracking Unit (RTU) is designed to score potential tracks through long-term information. In addition, we present a method of generating simulated tracking data without real data to overcome the defect of limited available data in MOT. The experiments demonstrate that our simulated tracking data is effective for training RTU and achieves state-of-the-art performance on both MOT17 and MOT16 benchmarks. Meanwhile, RTU can be flexibly plugged into classic trackers such as DeepSORT and MHT, and makes remarkable improvements as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01297

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only methods [50,53,54] that follow [66] and pretrain on 6 additional tracking datasets (6M) surpass TrackFormer's performance on MOT17 private detections.

    “Only [50,53,54] which follow [66] and pretrain on 6 additional tracking datasets (6M) surpass our performance.”

    From TrackFormer: Multi-Object Tracking with Transformers (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Sheng, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., & Xiong, Z.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment (CN)
  • Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
13199-13208
OpenAlex
W3202977309
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18
FWCI
4.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Science and Technology Development Fund
  • State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Keywords
multi-target tracking, limited training data, DeepSORT, MOT17, MOT16

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review