Cited by 109Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRadar Systems and Signal Processing

Robust Small Object Detection on the Water Surface through Fusion of Camera and Millimeter Wave Radar

Cheng, Yuwei, Xu, Hu, Liu, Yimin·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

In recent years, unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) have been experiencing growth in various applications. With the expansion of USVs’ application scenes from the typical marine areas to inland waters, new challenges arise for the object detection task, which is an essential part of the perception system of USVs. In our work, we focus on a relatively unexplored task for USVs in inland waters: small object detection on water surfaces, which is of vital importance for safe autonomous navigation and USVs’ certain missions such as floating waste cleaning. Considering the limitations of vision-based object detection, we propose a novel radar-vision fusion based method for robust small object detection on water surfaces. By using a novel representation format of millimeter wave radar point clouds and applying a deep-level multi-scale fusion of RGB images and radar data, the proposed method can efficiently utilize the characteristics of radar data and improve the accuracy and robustness for small object detection on water surfaces. We test the method on the real-world floating bottle dataset that we collected and released. The result shows that, our method improves the average detection accuracy significantly compared to the vision-based methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Besides, the proposed method performs robustly when single sensor degrades.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01498

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRKD proposes cross-modal knowledge distillation framework for improving camera-radar fusion through BEV representations.

    “CRKD [104] proposes a cross-modal knowledge distillation framework for improving camera-radar fusion through BEV representations.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 109

Authors
Cheng, Y., Xu, H., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
15243-15252
OpenAlex
W3204554924
Cited by
109
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 8
FWCI
14.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
Keywords
small object detection, water surface, unmanned surface vehicles, radar-vision fusion, millimeter-wave radar, multi-scale fusion, inland waters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review