LATR: 3D Lane Detection from Monocular Images with Transformer
Open accessAbstract
3D lane detection from monocular images is a fundamental yet challenging task in autonomous driving. Recent advances primarily rely on structural 3D surrogates (e.g., bird’s eye view) built from front-view image features and camera parameters. However, the depth ambiguity in monocular images inevitably causes misalignment between the constructed surrogate feature map and the original image, posing a great challenge for accurate lane detection. To address the above issue, we present a novel LATR model, an end-to-end 3D lane detector that uses 3D-aware front-view features without transformed view representation. Specifically, LATR detects 3D lanes via cross-attention based on query and key-value pairs, constructed using our lane-aware query generator and dynamic 3D ground positional embedding. On the one hand, each query is generated based on 2D lane-aware features and adopts a hybrid embedding to enhance the lane information. On the other hand, 3D space information is injected as positional embedding from an iteratively-updated 3D ground plane. LATR outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic Apollo and realistic OpenLane and ONCE-3DLanes by large margins (e.g., 11.4 gain in terms of F1 score on OpenLane). Code will be released at https://github.com/JMoonr/LATR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A monocular 3D lane detector, LATR, is used for evaluating 3D lane detection tasks, and a temporal 3D object detector, BEVFormer, for evaluating 3D cuboid detection tasks.
“Following the protocol described in (Ren et al., 2025), we use a monocular 3D lane detector, LATR (Luo et al., 2023), for evaluating 3D lane detection tasks, and a temporal 3D object detector, BEVFormer (Li et al., 2022), for evaluating 3D cuboid detection tasks.”
From World Simulation with Video Foundation Models for Physical AI (2025) · cites this paper as Luo et al., 2023
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · see citing works
End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 · Cited by 18,285 · see citing works
PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection From Point Clouds
Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Caesar, H., Zhou, L., Yang, J., & Beijbom, O. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01298 · Cited by 4,673 · see citing works
Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhu, X., Su, W., Lu, L., Li, B., Wang, X., & Dai, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04159 · Cited by 1,837 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Moreover, existing query-based object detection [2, 55, 16, 17, 28] perform query initialization either in a random manner, or by injecting tailored anchor design [45, 24] for 2D objects, or generating 3D frustum [25, 26] in the positional embeddings to provide localization information for 3D objects.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWang, Y., Chao, W.-L., Garg, D., Hariharan, B., Campbell, M., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00864 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection
Reading, C., Harakeh, A., Chae, J., & Waslander, S. L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00845 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
World Simulation with Video Foundation Models for Physical AI
NVIDIA, :, Ali, A., Bai, J., Bala, M., Balaji, Y., Blakeman, A., Cai, T., Cao, J., Cao, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.00062 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Following the protocol described in (Ren et al., 2025), we use a monocular 3D lane detector, LATR (Luo et al., 2023), for evaluating 3D lane detection tasks, and a temporal 3D object detector, BEVFormer (Li et al., 2022), for evaluating 3D cuboid detection tasks.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Luo, Y., Zheng, C., Yan, X., Kun, T., Zheng, C., Cui, S., & Li, Z.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Tencent (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-10-01
- Pages
- 7907-7918
- OpenAlex
- W4390872779
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 16
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- University of Hong Kong
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- 3D lane detection, monocular images, autonomous driving, cross-attention, transformer models, depth ambiguity, positional encoding, hybrid embeddings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review