Cited by 64Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Vision and Imaging

LATR: 3D Lane Detection from Monocular Images with Transformer

Open access
Luo, Yueru, Zheng, Chaoda, Yan, Xu, Kun, Tang, Zheng, Chao, Cui, Shuguang, Li, Zhen·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

3D lane detection from monocular images is a fundamental yet challenging task in autonomous driving. Recent advances primarily rely on structural 3D surrogates (e.g., bird’s eye view) built from front-view image features and camera parameters. However, the depth ambiguity in monocular images inevitably causes misalignment between the constructed surrogate feature map and the original image, posing a great challenge for accurate lane detection. To address the above issue, we present a novel LATR model, an end-to-end 3D lane detector that uses 3D-aware front-view features without transformed view representation. Specifically, LATR detects 3D lanes via cross-attention based on query and key-value pairs, constructed using our lane-aware query generator and dynamic 3D ground positional embedding. On the one hand, each query is generated based on 2D lane-aware features and adopts a hybrid embedding to enhance the lane information. On the other hand, 3D space information is injected as positional embedding from an iteratively-updated 3D ground plane. LATR outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic Apollo and realistic OpenLane and ONCE-3DLanes by large margins (e.g., 11.4 gain in terms of F1 score on OpenLane). Code will be released at https://github.com/JMoonr/LATR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00730

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A monocular 3D lane detector, LATR, is used for evaluating 3D lane detection tasks, and a temporal 3D object detector, BEVFormer, for evaluating 3D cuboid detection tasks.

    “Following the protocol described in (Ren et al., 2025), we use a monocular 3D lane detector, LATR (Luo et al., 2023), for evaluating 3D lane detection tasks, and a temporal 3D object detector, BEVFormer (Li et al., 2022), for evaluating 3D cuboid detection tasks.”

    From World Simulation with Video Foundation Models for Physical AI (2025) · cites this paper as Luo et al., 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, Y., Zheng, C., Yan, X., Kun, T., Zheng, C., Cui, S., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
7907-7918
OpenAlex
W4390872779
Cited by
64
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 16
FWCI
19.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
3D lane detection, monocular images, autonomous driving, cross-attention, transformer models, depth ambiguity, positional encoding, hybrid embeddings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review