Cited by 23Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

Scene Graph Contrastive Learning for Embodied Navigation

Singh, Kunal Pratap, Salvador, Jordi, Weihs, Luca, Kembhavi, Aniruddha·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Training effective embodied AI agents often involves expert imitation, specialized components such as maps, or leveraging additional sensors for depth and localization. Another approach is to use neural architectures alongside self-supervised objectives which encourage better representation learning. However, in practice, there are few guarantees that these self-supervised objectives encode task-relevant information. We propose the Scene Graph Contrastive (SGC) loss, which uses scene graphs as training-only supervisory signals. The SGC loss does away with explicit graph decoding and instead uses contrastive learning to align an agent’s representation with a rich graphical encoding of its environment. The SGC loss is simple to implement and encourages representations that encode objects’ semantics, relationships, and history. By using the SGC loss, we attain gains on three embodied tasks: Object Navigation, Multi-Object Navigation, and Arm Point Navigation. Finally, we present studies and analyses which demonstrate the ability of our trained representation to encode semantic cues about the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00999

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating multimodal memory with structured world representations such as spatial maps, object-centric graphs, or skill graphs can support abstraction across time and modality while improving retrieval efficiency.

    “Moreover, integrating multimodal memory with structured world representations, such as spatial maps, object-centric graphs (Singh et al., 2023), or skill graphs (Wang et al., 2025c; Feng et al., 2025a), can support abstraction across time and modality while improving retrieval efficiency.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, K. P., Salvador, J., Weihs, L., & Kembhavi, A.
Affiliations
Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
10850-10860
OpenAlex
W4390873597
Cited by
23
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6
FWCI
4.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
scene graph, contrastive learning, embodied navigation, self-supervised learning, representation learning, object navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review