Cited by 192Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Vision and Imaging

OpenOccupancy: A Large Scale Benchmark for Surrounding Semantic Occupancy Perception

Open access
Wang, Xiaofeng, Zhu, Zheng, Xu, Wenbo, Zhang, Yunpeng, Wei, Yi, Chi, Xu, Ye, Yun, Du, Dalong +2 more·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Semantic occupancy perception is essential for autonomous driving, as automated vehicles require a fine-grained perception of the 3D urban structures. However, existing relevant benchmarks lack diversity in urban scenes, and they only evaluate front-view predictions. Towards a comprehensive benchmarking of surrounding perception algorithms, we propose OpenOccupancy, which is the first surrounding semantic occupancy perception benchmark. In the OpenOccupancy benchmark, we extend the large-scale nuScenes dataset with dense semantic occupancy annotations. Previous annotations rely on LiDAR points superimposition, where some occupancy labels are missed due to sparse LiDAR channels. To mitigate the problem, we introduce the Augmenting And Purifying (AAP) pipeline to ~ 2× densify the annotations, where ∼4000 human hours are involved in the labeling process. Besides, camera-based, LiDAR-based and multi-modal baselines are established for the OpenOccupancy benchmark. Furthermore, considering the complexity of surrounding occupancy perception lies in the computational burden of high-resolution 3D predictions, we propose the Cascade Occupancy Network (CONet) to refine the coarse prediction, which relatively enhances the performance by ∼30% than the baseline. We hope the OpenOccupancy benchmark‡will boost the development of surrounding occupancy perception algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01636

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VQA-GNN introduces a shared context node to bridge visual and conceptual subgraphs, facilitating bidirectional message passing to mitigate modality-level representational gaps.

    “VQA-GNN [66] exemplifies this approach by introducing a shared context node to bridge visual and conceptual subgraphs, facilitating bidirectional message passing to mitigate modality-level representational gaps.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 192

Authors
Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., Chi, X., Ye, Y., Du, D., Lu, J., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • PhiGent Robotics
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
17804-17813
OpenAlex
W4390872638
Cited by
192
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 5
FWCI
59.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
autonomous driving, benchmark, nuScenes, LiDAR, camera-based perception, multisensory perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review