The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On-line Random Forests
Abstract
Random Forests (RFs) are frequently used in many computer vision and machine learning applications. Their popularity is mainly driven by their high computational efficiency during both training and evaluation while achieving state-of-the-art results. However, in most applications RFs are used off-line. This limits their usability for many practical problems, for instance, when training data arrives sequentially or the underlying distribution is continuously changing. In this paper, we propose a novel on-line random forest algorithm. We combine ideas from on-line bagging, extremely randomized forests and propose an on-line decision tree growing procedure. Additionally, we add a temporal weighting scheme for adaptively discarding some trees based on their out-of-bag-error in given time intervals and consequently growing of new trees. The experiments on common machine learning data sets show that our algorithm converges to the performance of the off-line RF. Additionally, we conduct experiments for visual tracking, where we demonstrate real-time state-of-the-art performance on well-known scenarios and show good performance in case of occlusions and appearance changes where we outperform trackers based on on-line boosting. Finally, we demonstrate the usability of on-line RFs on the task of interactive real-time segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance
Grossberg, S. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00862.x · Cited by 1,471
Cited by
High-Speed Tracking with Kernelized Correlation Filters
Henriques, J. F., Caseiro, R., Martins, P., & Batista, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2345390 · Cited by 5,753
Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016) · Test · doi:10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 · Cited by 4,149
Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., & Matas, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.239 · Cited by 3,285
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2018) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1249 · Cited by 3,103
Exploiting the Circulant Structure of Tracking-by-Detection with Kernels
Henriques, J. F., Caseiro, R., Martins, P., & Batista, J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33765-9_50 · Cited by 2,310
Metadata
- Authors
- Saffari, A., Leistner, C., Santner, J., Godec, M., & Bischof, H.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-09
- Pages
- 1393-1400
- OpenAlex
- W2162152641
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On-line Random Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccvw.2009.5457447
- The paper
- Saffari, A., Leistner, C., Santner, J., Godec, M., & Bischof, H. (2009). On-line Random Forests. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccvw.2009.5457447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.