Cited by 132Radar Systems and Signal ProcessingAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesPAPR reduction in OFDM

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance Analysis of Joint Radar and Communication using OFDM and OTFS

Open access
Gaudio, Lorenzo, Kobayashi, Mari, Bissinger, Bjorn, Caire, Giuseppe·2019·2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops)

Abstract

We consider a joint radar estimation and communication system using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulations. The scenario is motivated by vehicular applications where a vehicle equipped with a mono-static radar wishes to communicate data to its target receiver, while estimating parameters of interest related to this receiver. By focusing on the case of a single target, we derive the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator and the Cramer-Rao lower bound on joint velocity and range estimation. Numerical examples demonstrate that both digital modulation formats can achieve as accurate range/velocity estimation as state-of-the-art radar waveforms such as frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) while sending digital information at their full achievable rate. We conclude that it is possible to obtain significant data transmission rate without compromising the radar estimation capabilities of the system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccw.2019.8757044

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. richards, 2014, Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 132

Metadata

Authors
Gaudio, L., Kobayashi, M., Bissinger, B., & Caire, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
1-6
ISSN
2164-7038 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913265698
Cited by
132
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6
FWCI
17.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Fondazione Cariparma
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › PAPR reduction in OFDM
Keywords
joint radar-communication, OFDM, orthogonal time frequency space, Cramer-Rao lower bound, maximum likelihood estimation, range estimation, velocity estimation, automotive radar, digital modulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review