The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student's perception in the classrooms response system
Abstract
Kahoot, Quizizz, and Google Forms are learning technology opens for new ways of teaching in the classroom. The teachers' laptops connected to a video projector, access to wireless network and the students smartphones, tablets or laptops can be utilized to enhance the interaction between the teacher and students, as well as boost the students motivation, engagement and learning. This paper shows the results from investigating the effect of using Kahoot, Quizizz, and Google Forms in classroom on how the students' perception of concentration, engagement, enjoyment, perceived learning, motivation, and satisfaction. The results show that students learned something from doing the quiz via Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms. But, there are significant differences in the concentration, engagement, enjoyment, motivation, and satisfaction. Kahoot and Quizizz has presented a lot of positives over Google forms when used in the classroom.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The stage of the game where correct answers are hidden until all students have given their answers creates a suspension that can increase enjoyment, motivation, and concentration.
“This stage of the game creates a suspension that can increase enjoyment, motivation, and concentration”
From The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Chaiyo & Nokham, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 9 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R.
- Affiliations
- Chiangrai College (TH)
- Venue
- 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 178-182
- OpenAlex
- W2608960955
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 56.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- Kahoot, Quizizz, Google Forms, clickers, student perceptions, student engagement, student motivation, student satisfaction, concentration, enjoyment, gamified quizzes, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review