The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis
Abstract
Neural networks are a powerful technology forclassification of visual inputs arising from documents.However, there is a confusing plethora of different neuralnetwork methods that are used in the literature and inindustry. This paper describes a set of concrete bestpractices that document analysis researchers can use toget good results with neural networks. The mostimportant practice is getting a training set as large aspossible: we expand the training set by adding a newform of distorted data. The next most important practiceis that convolutional neural networks are better suited forvisual document tasks than fully connected networks. Wepropose that a simple do-it-yourself implementation ofconvolution with a flexible architecture is suitable formany visual document problems. This simpleconvolutional neural network does not require complexmethods, such as momentum, weight decay, structure-dependentlearning rates, averaging layers, tangent prop,or even finely-tuning the architecture. The end result is avery simple yet general architecture which can yieldstate-of-the-art performance for document analysis. Weillustrate our claims on the MNIST set of English digitimages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Neural networks for pattern recognition
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,538
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1990) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(90)90005-6 · Cited by 2,111
Training Invariant Support Vector Machines
Decoste, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012454411458 · Cited by 588
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
LeCun, Y. (2024) · doi:10.57702/yobif9bg · Cited by 313
Mitigating the paucity-of-data problem
Banko, M., & Brill, E. (2001) · International Conference on Human Language Technology Research · doi:10.3115/1072133.1072204 · Cited by 96
Effective Training of a Neural Network Character Classifier for Word Recognition
Yaeger, L., Lyon, R. F., & Webb, B. J. (1996) · Cited by 88
An offline cursive handwritten word recognition system
Tay, Y. H., Lallican, P.-M., Khalid, M., Viard-Gaudin, C., & Kneer, S. (2002) · IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) · doi:10.1109/tencon.2001.949649 · Cited by 36
Cited by
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Metadata
- Authors
- Simard, P. Y., Steinkraus, D., & Platt, J. C.
- Venue
- Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2005-04-12
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 958-963
- ISSN
- 1520-5363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156163116
- Cited by
- 2,741
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 22.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdar.2003.1227801
- The paper
- Simard, P. Y., Steinkraus, D., & Platt, J. C. (2005). Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2003.1227801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.