Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Convolutional Neural Network Committees for Handwritten Character Classification

Ciresan, Dan Claudiu, Meier, Ueli, Gambardella, Luca Maria, Schmidhuber, Jurgen·2011·2011 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition

Abstract

In 2010, after many years of stagnation, the MNIST handwriting recognition benchmark record dropped from 0.40% error rate to 0.35%. Here we report 0.27% for a committee of seven deep CNNs trained on graphics cards, narrowing the gap to human performance. We also apply the same architecture to NIST SD 19, a more challenging dataset including lower and upper case letters. A committee of seven CNNs obtains the best results published so far for both NIST digits and NIST letters. The robustness of our method is verified by analyzing 78125 different 7-net committees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdar.2011.229

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
Ciresan, D. C., Meier, U., Gambardella, L. M., & Schmidhuber, J.
Venue
2011 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-09
Pages
1135-1139
ISSN
1520-5363 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033154814
Cited by
536
References
5
FWCI
13.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convolutional Neural Network Committees for Handwritten Character Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdar.2011.229
The paper
Ciresan, D. C., Meier, U., Gambardella, L. M., & Schmidhuber, J. (2011). Convolutional Neural Network Committees for Handwritten Character Classification. 2011 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2011.229

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.