The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Performance OCR for Printed English and Fraktur Using LSTM Networks
Abstract
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks have yielded excellent results on handwriting recognition. This paper describes an application of bidirectional LSTM networks to the problem of machine-printed Latin and Fraktur recognition. Latin and Fraktur recognition differs significantly from handwriting recognition in both the statistical properties of the data, as well as in the required, much higher levels of accuracy. Applications of LSTM networks to handwriting recognition use two-dimensional recurrent networks, since the exact position and baseline of handwritten characters is variable. In contrast, for printed OCR, we used a one-dimensional recurrent network combined with a novel algorithm for baseline and x-height normalization. A number of databases were used for training and testing, including the UW3 database, artificially generated and degraded Fraktur text and scanned pages from a book digitization project. The LSTM architecture achieved 0.6% character-level test-set error on English text. When the artificially degraded Fraktur data set is divided into training and test sets, the system achieves an error rate of 1.64%. On specific books printed in Fraktur (not part of the training set), the system achieves error rates of 0.15% (Fontane) and 1.47% (Ersch-Gruber). These recognition accuracies were found without using any language modelling or any other post-processing techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult
Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279181 · Cited by 8,542
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Metadata
- Authors
- Breuel, T. M., Ul-Hasan, A., Al-Azawi, M. A., & Shafait, F.
- Venue
- 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-08
- Pages
- 683-687
- ISSN
- 1520-5363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060580591
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Performance OCR for Printed English and Fraktur Using LSTM Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdar.2013.140
- The paper
- Breuel, T. M., Ul-Hasan, A., Al-Azawi, M. A., & Shafait, F. (2013). High-Performance OCR for Printed English and Fraktur Using LSTM Networks. 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2013.140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.