The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICDAR 2015 competition on Robust Reading
Abstract
Results of the ICDAR 2015 Robust Reading Competition are presented. A new Challenge 4 on Incidental Scene Text has been added to the Challenges on Born-Digital Images, Focused Scene Images and Video Text. Challenge 4 is run on a newly acquired dataset of 1,670 images evaluating Text Localisation, Word Recognition and End-to-End pipelines. In addition, the dataset for Challenge 3 on Video Text has been substantially updated with more video sequences and more accurate ground truth data. Finally, tasks assessing End-to-End system performance have been introduced to all Challenges. The competition took place in the first quarter of 2015, and received a total of 44 submissions. Only the tasks newly introduced in 2015 are reported on. The datasets, the ground truth specification and the evaluation protocols are presented together with the results and a brief summary of the participating methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge: A Retrospective
Everingham, M., Eslami, S. M. A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-014-0733-5 · Cited by 7,139
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics
Bernardin, K., & Stiefelhagen, R. (2008) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1155/2008/246309 · Cited by 2,918
Cited by
DOTA: A Large-Scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Images
Xia, G.-S., Bai, X., Ding, J., Zhu, Z., Belongie, S., Luo, J., Datcu, M., Pelillo, M., & Zhang, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00418 · Cited by 3,414
Synthetic Data for Text Localisation in Natural Images
Gupta, A., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.254 · Cited by 1,563
SCRDet: Towards More Robust Detection for Small, Cluttered and Rotated Objects
Yang, X., Yang, J., Yan, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, T., Guo, Z., Sun, X., & Fu, K. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00832 · Cited by 1,044
Object Detection in Aerial Images: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Challenges
Ding, J., Xue, N., Xia, G.-S., Bai, X., Yang, W., Yang, M. Y., Belongie, S., Luo, J., Datcu, M., Pelillo, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3117983 · Cited by 678
PixelLink: Detecting Scene Text via Instance Segmentation
Deng, D., Liu, H., Li, X., & Cai, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12269 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Karatzas, D., Gomez-Bigorda, L., Nicolaou, A., Ghosh, S., Bagdanov, A., Iwamura, M., Matas, J., Neumann, L., Chandrasekhar, V. R., Lu, S., Shafait, F., Uchida, S., & Valveny, E.
- Venue
- 2015 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-08
- Pages
- 1156-1160
- ISSN
- 1520-5363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144554289
- Cited by
- 1,547
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ICDAR 2015 competition on Robust Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdar.2015.7333942
- The paper
- Karatzas, D., Gomez-Bigorda, L., Nicolaou, A., Ghosh, S., Bagdanov, A., Iwamura, M., Matas, J., Neumann, L., Chandrasekhar, V. R., Lu, S., Shafait, F., Uchida, S., & Valveny, E. (2015). ICDAR 2015 competition on Robust Reading. 2015 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2015.7333942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
