The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ZebraLancer: Private and Anonymous Crowdsourcing System atop Open Blockchain
Abstract
We design and implement the first private and anonymous decentralized crowdsourcing system ZebraLancer, and overcome two fundamental challenges of decentralizing crowdsourcing, i.e. data leakage and identity breach. First, our outsource-then-prove methodology resolves the tension between blockchain transparency and data confidentiality, which is critical in crowdsourcing use-case. ZebraLancer ensures: (i) a requester will not pay more than what data deserve, according to a policy announced when her task is published via the blockchain; (ii) each worker indeed gets a payment based on the policy, if he submits data to the blockchain; (iii) the above properties are realized not only without a central arbiter, but also without leaking the data to the open blockchain. Furthermore, the transparency of blockchain allows one to infer private information about workers and requesters through their participation history. On the other hand, allowing anonymity will enable a malicious worker to submit multiple times to reap rewards. ZebraLancer overcomes this problem by allowing anonymous requests/submissions without sacrificing the accountability. The idea behind is a subtle linkability: if a worker submits twice to a task, anyone can link the submissions, or else he stays anonymous and unlinkable across tasks. To realize this delicate linkability, we put forward a novel cryptographic concept, i.e. the common-prefix-linkable anonymous authentication. We remark the new anonymous authentication scheme might be of independent interest. Finally, we implement our protocol for a common image annotation task and deploy it in a test net of Ethereum. The experiment results show the applicability of our protocol with the existing real-world blockchain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments
Chaum, D. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18 · Cited by 3,329
Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.55 · Cited by 2,227
Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks
Szabo, N. (1997) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v2i9.548 · Cited by 2,158
Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges
Ganti, R., Ye, F., & Lei, H. (2011) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2011.6069707 · Cited by 2,075
IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File SystemPreprint
Benet, J. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.opodis.2022.9 · Cited by 1,856
The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications
Garay, J. A., Kiayias, A., & Leonardos, N. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46803-6_10 · Cited by 1,396
An Efficient System for Non-transferable Anonymous Credentials with Optional Anonymity Revocation
Camenisch, J., & Lysyanskaya, A. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44987-6_7 · Cited by 1,321
Chaum, D., Fiat, A., & Naor, M. (1990) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/0-387-34799-2_25 · Cited by 1,138
Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., & Tang, J. (2012) · ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) · doi:10.1145/2348543.2348567 · Cited by 1,003
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- hopwood, 0, Zcash Protocol Specification
- muncaster, 0, China's Internet wunderkind in the dock over alleged fraud
- wei, 0, Alipay apologizes for leak of personal info
- kelly, 0, Apple account hack raises concern about cloud storage
- mike isaac, 0, Uber hid 2016 breach paying hackers to delete stolen data
- kate, 0, Blockchain privacy Challenges solutions and unresolved issues
- 0, Ethereum Team Byzantium HF Announcement
- buterin, 2014, A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain and AI-Based Solutions to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Like Epidemics: A Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., & Seneviratne, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3093633 · Cited by 286
zkCrowd: a hybrid blockchain-based crowdsourcing platform
Zhu, S., Cai, Z., Hu, H., Li, Y., & Li, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2941735 · Cited by 206
A survey of blockchain from security perspective
Dasgupta, D., Shrein, J. M., & Gupta, K. D. (2019) · Journal of Banking and Financial Technology · doi:10.1007/s42786-018-00002-6 · Cited by 204
B-Ride: Ride Sharing With Privacy-Preservation, Trust and Fair Payment Atop Public Blockchain
Baza, M., Lasla, N., Abdallah, M. M., Srivastava, G., & Abdallah, M. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2019.2959230 · Cited by 203
Anonymous Reputation System for IIoT-Enabled Retail Marketing Atop PoS Blockchain
Liu, D., Alahmadi, A., Ni, J., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2898900 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Tang, Q., & Wang, G.
- Affiliations
- New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-07
- Pages
- 853-865
- OpenAlex
- W2790257806
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 21.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- blockchain, data privacy, data leakage, linkability, unlinkability, anonymous authentication, Ethereum, image annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review