The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Scalable Collaborative Filtering Framework Based on Co-Clustering
Abstract
Collaborative filtering-based recommender systems have become extremely popular due to the increase in Web-based activities such as e-commerce and online content distribution. Current collaborative filtering (CF) techniques such as correlation and SVD based methods provide good accuracy, but are computationally expensive and can be deployed only in static off-line settings. However, a number of practical scenarios require dynamic real-time collaborative filtering that can allow new users, items and ratings to enter the system at a rapid rate. In this paper, we consider a novel CF approach based on a proposed weighted co-clustering algorithm (Banerjee et al., 2004) that involves simultaneous clustering of users and items. We design incremental and parallel versions of the co-clustering algorithm and use it to build an efficient real-time CF framework. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that our approach provides an accuracy comparable to that of the correlation and matrix factorization based approaches at a much lower computational cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook
Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2011) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1 · Cited by 2,378
CopyCatch: stopping group attacks by spotting lockstep behavior in social networks
Beutel, A., Xu, W., Guruswami, V., Palow, C., & Faloutsos, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488400 · Cited by 335
A bias detection tree approach for detecting disparities in a recommendation model’s errors
Misztal-Radecka, J., & Indurkhya, B. (2023) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-022-09334-x · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- George, T., & Merugu, S.
- Venue
- Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-01-05
- Pages
- 625-628
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136944193
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.