The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Execution Anomaly Detection in Distributed Systems through Unstructured Log Analysis
Abstract
Detection of execution anomalies is very important for the maintenance, development, and performance refinement of large scale distributed systems. Execution anomalies include both work flow errors and low performance problems. People often use system logs produced by distributed systems for troubleshooting and problem diagnosis. However, manually inspecting system logs to detect anomalies is unfeasible due to the increasing scale and complexity of distributed systems. Therefore, there is a great demand for automatic anomalies detection techniques based on log analysis. In this paper, we propose an unstructured log analysis technique for anomalies detection. In the technique, we propose a novel algorithm to convert free form text messages in log files to log keys without heavily relying on application specific knowledge. The log keys correspond to the log-print statements in the source code which can provide cues of system execution behavior. After converting log messages to log keys, we learn a Finite State Automaton (FSA) from training log sequences to present the normal work flow for each system component. At the same time, a performance measurement model is learned to characterize the normal execution performance based on the log messages' timing information. With these learned models, we can automatically detect anomalies in newly input log files. Experiments on Hadoop and SILK show that the technique can effectively detect running anomalies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs through Deep Learning
Du, M., Li, F., Zheng, G., & Srikumar, V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134015 · Cited by 1,835
Drain: an online log parsing approach with fixed depth tree
He, P., Zhu, J., Zheng, Z., & Lyu, M. R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) · doi:10.1109/icws.2017.13 · Cited by 943
Robust log-based anomaly detection on unstable log data
Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Lin, Q., Qiao, B., Zhang, H., Dang, Y., Xie, C., Yang, X., Cheng, Q., Li, Z., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3338906.3338931 · Cited by 761
Self-citationTools and benchmarks for automated log parsing
Zhu, J., He, S., Liu, J., He, P., Xie, Q., Zheng, Z., & Lyu, M. R. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip.2019.00021 · Cited by 574
Spell: Streaming Parsing of System Event Logs
Du, M., & Li, F. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2016.0103 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, Q., Lou, J.-G., Wang, Y., & Li, J.
- Venue
- 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-12
- Pages
- 149-158
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102632804
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Execution Anomaly Detection in Distributed Systems through Unstructured Log Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2009.60
- The paper
- Fu, Q., Lou, J.-G., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2009). Execution Anomaly Detection in Distributed Systems through Unstructured Log Analysis. 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2009.60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.