The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recommending Social Events from Mobile Phone Location Data
Open accessAbstract
A city offers thousands of social events a day, and it is difficult for dwellers to make choices. The combination of mobile phones and recommender systems can change the way one deals with such abundance. Mobile phones with positioning technology are now widely available, making it easy for people to broadcast their whereabouts, recommender systems can now identify patterns in people's movements in order to, for example, recommend events. To do so, the system relies on having mobile users who share their attendance at a large number of social events: cold-start users, who have no location history, cannot receive recommendations. We set out to address the mobile cold-start problem by answering the following research question: how can social events be recommended to a cold-start user based only on his home location? To answer this question, we carry out a study of the relationship between preferences for social events and geography, the first of its kind in a large metropolitan area. We sample location estimations of one million mobile phone users in Greater Boston, combine the sample with social events in the same area, and infer the social events attended by 2,519 residents. Upon this data, we test a variety of algorithms for recommending social events. We find that the most effective algorithm recommends events that are popular among residents of an area. The least effective, instead, recommends events that are geographically close to the area. This last result has interesting implications for location-based services that emphasize recommending nearby events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Urban Sensing Using Mobile Phone Network Data: A Survey of Research
Calabrese, F., Ferrari, L., & Blondel, V. D. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2655691 · Cited by 332
Self-citationA Random Walk around the City: New Venue Recommendation in Location-Based Social Networks
Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lathia, N., & Mascolo, C. (2012) · 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.70 · Cited by 184
Self-citationTowards Safety and Sustainability: Designing Local Recommendations for Post-pandemic World
Patro, G. K., Chakraborty, A., Banerjee, A., & Ganguly, N. (2020) · Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3383313.3412251 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Quercia, D., Lathia, N., Calabrese, F., Di Lorenzo, G., & Crowcroft, J.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-12
- Pages
- 971-976
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106558516
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommending Social Events from Mobile Phone Location Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2010.152
- The paper
- Quercia, D., Lathia, N., Calabrese, F., Di Lorenzo, G., & Crowcroft, J. (2010). Recommending Social Events from Mobile Phone Location Data. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2010.152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.