The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks
Abstract
Social media forms a central domain for the production and dissemination of real-time information. Even though such flows of information have traditionally been thought of as diffusion processes over social networks, the underlying phenomena are the result of a complex web of interactions among numerous participants. Here we develop the Linear Influence Model where rather than requiring the knowledge of the social network and then modeling the diffusion by predicting which node will influence which other nodes in the network, we focus on modeling the global influence of a node on the rate of diffusion through the (implicit) network. We model the number of newly infected nodes as a function of which other nodes got infected in the past. For each node we estimate an influence function that quantifies how many subsequent infections can be attributed to the influence of that node over time. A nonparametric formulation of the model leads to a simple least squares problem that can be solved on large datasets. We validate our model on a set of 500 million tweets and a set of 170 million news articles and blog posts. We show that the Linear Influence Model accurately models influences of nodes and reliably predicts the temporal dynamics of information diffusion. We find that patterns of influence of individual participants differ significantly depending on the type of the node and the topic of the information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14033 · Cited by 3,022 · cited 1×
“Even though the diffusion of information has been an active research area recently [7], [12], [26], [28], modeling the diffusion in social networks has proven to be a challenging task.”
BackgroundColeman, T. F., & Li, Y. (1996) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/s1052623494240456 · Cited by 604
Cited by
Information diffusion in online social networks: a survey
Guille, A., Hacid, H., Favre, C., & Zighed, D. A. (2013) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/2503792.2503797 · Cited by 851
Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning
Wang, B., Zhu, J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D., & Batzoglou, S. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4207 · Cited by 706
The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., & Watts, D. J. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158 · Cited by 647
Social Media Mining: An Introduction
Zafarani, R., Abbasi, M. A., & Liu, H. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139088510 · Cited by 592
Dynamics of information diffusion and its applications on complex networks
Zhang, Z.-K., Liu, C., Zhan, X.-X., Lu, X., Zhang, C.-X., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.002 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J., & Leskovec, J.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-12
- Pages
- 599-608
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140540364
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2010.22
- The paper
- Yang, J., & Leskovec, J. (2010). Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2010.22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.