Cited by 141Complex Network Analysis TechniquesGraph Theory and AlgorithmsAdvanced Graph Theory Research

Tree-Like Structure in Large Social and Information Networks

Adcock, Aaron B., Sullivan, Blair D., Mahoney, Michael W.·2013·2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

Although large social and information networks are often thought of as having hierarchical or tree-like structure, this assumption is rarely tested. We have performed a detailed empirical analysis of the tree-like properties of realistic informatics graphs using two very different notions of tree-likeness: Gromov's d-hyperbolicity, which is a notion from geometric group theory that measures how tree-like a graph is in terms of its metric structure, and tree decompositions, tools from structural graph theory which measure how tree-like a graph is in terms of its cut structure. Although realistic informatics graphs often do not have meaningful tree-like structure when viewed with respect to the simplest and most popular metrics, e.g., the value of d or the tree width, we conclude that many such graphs do have meaningful tree-like structure when viewed with respect to more refined metrics, e.g., a size-resolved notion of d or a closer analysis of the tree decompositions. We also show that, although these two rigorous notions of tree-likeness capture very different tree-like structures in worst-case, for realistic informatics graphs they empirically identify surprisingly similar structure. We interpret this tree-like structure in terms of the recently-characterized "nested core-periphery" property of large informatics graphs, and we show that the fast and scalable k-core heuristic can be used to identify this tree-like structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdm.2013.77

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many real-world networks exhibit an underlying tree-like structure.

    “the empirical analysis of Adcock et al. [1] indicated that many real-world networks exhibit an underlying tree-like structure”
  • Many complex symbolic datasets exhibit a latent hierarchical structure.

    “complex symbolic datasets often exhibit a latent hierarchical structure”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adcock, A. B., Sullivan, B. D., & Mahoney, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-12
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058600246
Cited by
141
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Graph Theory Research
Keywords
tree-like structures, social networks, information networks, tree decomposition, treewidth, k-core decomposition, network metrics, hierarchy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review