Tree-Like Structure in Large Social and Information Networks
Abstract
Although large social and information networks are often thought of as having hierarchical or tree-like structure, this assumption is rarely tested. We have performed a detailed empirical analysis of the tree-like properties of realistic informatics graphs using two very different notions of tree-likeness: Gromov's d-hyperbolicity, which is a notion from geometric group theory that measures how tree-like a graph is in terms of its metric structure, and tree decompositions, tools from structural graph theory which measure how tree-like a graph is in terms of its cut structure. Although realistic informatics graphs often do not have meaningful tree-like structure when viewed with respect to the simplest and most popular metrics, e.g., the value of d or the tree width, we conclude that many such graphs do have meaningful tree-like structure when viewed with respect to more refined metrics, e.g., a size-resolved notion of d or a closer analysis of the tree decompositions. We also show that, although these two rigorous notions of tree-likeness capture very different tree-like structures in worst-case, for realistic informatics graphs they empirically identify surprisingly similar structure. We interpret this tree-like structure in terms of the recently-characterized "nested core-periphery" property of large informatics graphs, and we show that the fast and scalable k-core heuristic can be used to identify this tree-like structure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many real-world networks exhibit an underlying tree-like structure.
“the empirical analysis of Adcock et al. [1] indicated that many real-world networks exhibit an underlying tree-like structure”
From Poincaré Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representations (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Many complex symbolic datasets exhibit a latent hierarchical structure.
“complex symbolic datasets often exhibit a latent hierarchical structure”
From Poincaré Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representations (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
Gromov, M. (1987) · Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9586-7_3 · Cited by 1,817 · see citing works
Large-scale curvature of networks
Narayan, O., & Saniee, I. (2011) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.84.066108 · Cited by 145 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The tendency for δ to begin to decrease as the diameter of the quadruplets increases has been noted in previous work [34].”
BackgroundResult
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Poincaré Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representations
Nickel, M., & Kiela, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08039 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Emergent Complex Network Geometry
Wu, Z., Menichetti, G., Rahmede, C., & Bianconi, G. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10073 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adcock, A. B., Sullivan, B. D., & Mahoney, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-12
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058600246
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Graph Theory Research
- Keywords
- tree-like structures, social networks, information networks, tree decomposition, treewidth, k-core decomposition, network metrics, hierarchy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review