Binarized attributed network embedding
Open accessAbstract
Attributed network embedding enables joint representation learning of node links and attributes. Existing attributed network embedding models are designed in continuous Euclidean spaces which often introduce data redundancy and impose challenges to storage and computation costs. To this end, we present a Binarized Attributed Network Embedding model (BANE for short) to learn binary node representation. Specifically, we define a new Weisfeiler-Lehman proximity matrix to capture data dependence between node links and attributes by aggregating the information of node attributes and links from neighboring nodes to a given target node in a layer-wise manner. Based on the Weisfeiler-Lehman proximity matrix, we formulate a new Weisfiler-Lehman matrix factorization learning function under the binary node representation constraint. The learning problem is a mixed integer optimization and an efficient cyclic coordinate descent (CCD) algorithm is used as the solution. Node classification and link prediction experiments on real-world datasets show that the proposed BANE model outperforms the state-of-the-art network embedding methods.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Network embedding contains non-deep learning methods such as matrix factorization and random walks.
“On the other hand, network embedding contains other non-deep learning methods such as matrix factorization [33], [34] and random walks [35].”
From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Yang, H., Pan, S., Zhang, P., Chen, L., Lian, D., & Zhang, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-11
- Pages
- 1476-1481
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914080035
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian Research Council (DP180100966)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Keywords
- attributed network embedding, matrix factorization, mixed integer programming, cyclic coordinate descent, node classification, link prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review