Cited by 19Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning with Meta-Learned Class Structures

Zheng, Guangtao, Zhang, Aidong·2021·2021 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abstract

Learning continually from few-shot examples is a hallmark of human intelligence but it poses a great challenge for deep neural networks since they commonly suffer from catastrophic forgetting and overfitting. In this paper, we tackle this challenge in the few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) setting, where a sequence of few-shot learning sessions containing disjoint sets of classes is created for a model to incrementally learn new classes, and the model should avoid forgetting information of old classes. Simply accumulating information of all learned classes will severely degrade the performance of the model since new classes are not learned to be discriminative across different sessions and they tend to be biased with limited training examples. To address this problem, we introduce class structures to regularize the learned classes on how they should distribute in the embedding space such that they are distinctive with each other within and across different learning sessions. Concretely, these class structures are encoded in a subspace where an alignment kernel aligns a learned class with class structures by moving it along the base vectors of the subspace. We sample incremental tasks in the training to simulate incremental learning and formulate the training as a meta-learning process to learn generalizable class structures across many incremental tasks. Experimental results on the CIFAR100, miniImageNet, and CUB200 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our metho…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00058

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zheng and Zhang [95] introduced meta-learned class structures to regulate the distribution of learned classes in the feature space.

    “Zheng and Zhang [95] introduced metalearned class structures to regulate the distribution of learned classes in the feature space.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, G., & Zhang, A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
2021 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12
Pages
421-430
ISSN
2375-9259 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205473927
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
few-shot class-incremental learning, catastrophic forgetting, meta-learning, class structure, overfitting, continual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review