Cited by 28Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Personalized Large Language Models

Woźniak, Stanisław, Koptyra, Bartłomiej, Janz, Arkadiusz, Kazienko, Przemysław, Kocoń, Jan·2024·2024 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks in recent years. However, their universal nature poses limitations in scenarios requiring personalized responses, such as recommendation systems and chatbots. This paper investigates methods to personalize LLMs, comparing fine-tuning and zero-shot reasoning approaches on subjective tasks. Results demonstrate that personalized fine-tuning improves model reasoning compared to non-personalized models. Experiments on datasets for emotion recognition and hate speech detection show consistent performance gains with personalized methods across different LLM architectures. These findings underscore the importance of personalization for enhancing LLM capabilities in subjective text perception tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdmw65004.2024.00071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalized finetuning yields improved model reasoning over zero-shot prompting.

    “Furthermore, Wo´ zniak et al. (2024) show that personalized finetuning yields improved model reasoning over zeroshot prompting.”

    From On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations (2024) · cites this paper as Woźniak et al., 2024

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 28

Authors
Woźniak, S., Koptyra, B., Janz, A., Kazienko, P., & Kocoń, J.
Affiliations
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
Venue
2024 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-12-09
Pages
511-520
ISSN
2375-9259 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408564965
Cited by
28
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17
FWCI
8.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education
  • Horizon Europe
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
personalized large language models, zero-shot reasoning, emotion recognition, hate speech detection, recommender systems, chatbots, LLM architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review