Personalized Large Language Models
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks in recent years. However, their universal nature poses limitations in scenarios requiring personalized responses, such as recommendation systems and chatbots. This paper investigates methods to personalize LLMs, comparing fine-tuning and zero-shot reasoning approaches on subjective tasks. Results demonstrate that personalized fine-tuning improves model reasoning compared to non-personalized models. Experiments on datasets for emotion recognition and hate speech detection show consistent performance gains with personalized methods across different LLM architectures. These findings underscore the importance of personalization for enhancing LLM capabilities in subjective text perception tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personalized finetuning yields improved model reasoning over zero-shot prompting.
“Furthermore, Wo´ zniak et al. (2024) show that personalized finetuning yields improved model reasoning over zeroshot prompting.”
From On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations (2024) · cites this paper as Woźniak et al., 2024
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Woźniak, S., Koptyra, B., Janz, A., Kazienko, P., & Kocoń, J.
- Affiliations
- Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
- Venue
- 2024 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-12-09
- Pages
- 511-520
- ISSN
- 2375-9259 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408564965
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- Horizon Europe
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- personalized large language models, zero-shot reasoning, emotion recognition, hate speech detection, recommender systems, chatbots, LLM architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review