The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Ethical Implications of Generative AI: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective
Abstract
The capacity of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) to develop material such as writing, graphics, and music is one of its defining characteristics. Generative AI has applications in a broad variety of fields, including but not limited to the following: art, literature, software development, education, product design, healthcare, finance, gaming, entertainment, and many more. From the viewpoint of many disciplines, this research study presents the implications of generative AI, considering the technical, educational, legal, and social aspects of the area. By combining concepts from various domains, this article aims to present a comprehensive understanding of the ethical concerns posed by generative AI. Additionally, the research will provide viable frameworks for resolving these issues.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These concerns may influence designers’ willingness to adopt such technologies and shape how AI is positioned within creative workflows (Panchanadikar and Freeman 2024; Singh et al. 2024).”
From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Singh et al. 2024
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the ethical concerns raised by participants—including attribution, originality, and labor displacement—mirror broader debates in the literature on responsible AI integration in creative industries (Singh et al. 2024).”
From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Singh et al. 2024
In the citing paper
“While the tools are praised for their ability to automate repetitive tasks and enhance efficiency, there is a palpable concern about their impact on the integrity of human-authored content (Naik et al. 2024; Singh et al. 2024).”
From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Singh et al. 2024
In the citing paper
“Taken together, these findings suggest that ethical ambivalence toward generative AI is not rooted in technological conservatism, but in a desire to protect the visibility of human authorship, ensure equitable labor practices, and uphold the cultural and professional standards of game design (Boucher et al. 2024; Singh et al. 2024).”
From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Singh et al. 2024
Citations
Cites
Generative adversarial networks
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3422622 · Cited by 18,384
A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., & Tang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123618 · Cited by 1,452
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31161 · Cited by 995
Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis
Harzing, A.-W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2007) · Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics · doi:10.3354/esep00076 · Cited by 677
Generative AI in Education and Research: Opportunities, Concerns, and Solutions
Alasadi, E. A., & Baiz, C. R. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00323 · Cited by 463
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data
Yu, N., Skripniuk, V., Abdelnabi, S., & Fritz, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01418 · Cited by 195
Waqas, A., Bui, M. M., Glassy, E. F., Naqa, I. E., Borkowski, P., Borkowski, A., & Rasool, G. (2023) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100255 · Cited by 158
The Social Impact of Generative AI: An Analysis on ChatGPT
Baldassarre, M. T., Caivano, D., Nieto, B. F., Gigante, D., & Ragone, A. (2023) · International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT) · doi:10.1145/3582515.3609555 · Cited by 151
Gupta, V. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12030103 · Cited by 120
Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence
McIntosh, T. R., Susnjak, T., Arachchilage, N., Liu, T., Xu, D., Watters, P., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2025.3569516 · Cited by 104
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jo, 2023, The promise and peril of generative AI, Nature, 614, 214
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation?
Alharthi, S. A. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060060 · Cited by 49
“More-over, the ethical concerns raised by participants—including attribution, originality, and labor displacement—mirror broader debates in the literature on responsible AI integration in creative industries (Singh et al. 2024).”
InfluentialGenerative AI as a More Knowledgeable Other: An Autoethnographic Study of Game Design Education
Alharthi, S. A. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16115689 · Cited by 1
Hnatushenko, V., Khomenko, V., Пащенко, О., & Грищак, С. В. (2026) · doi:10.31474/ceur-ws.org/vol-4225/paper8
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, G., Srivastava, V., Kumar, S., Bhatnagar, V., & Dhondiyal, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Graphic Era Hill University (IN)
- M.M.(Deemed to be University),MMICT&BM,Ambala,Haryana,India
- Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN)
- Graphic Era University (IN)
- Venue
- 2024 5th International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-08-07
- Pages
- 1714-1719
- OpenAlex
- W4403060503
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- generative AI, AI ethics, ethical implications, legal aspects of AI, educational implications, societal impact of AI, interdisciplinary perspectives, ethical frameworks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
