The Impact of AI Tools in Education Environment
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining popularity and influence in our society. New emerging artificial intelligence tools (AIT) are released to the public and are gaining momentum with a growing debate about the possible negative and positive effects of these new tools on students' skills, specifically their emotional intelligence (EI). This article addresses the scarcity of research related to Artificial Intelligence Tools AIT specifically ChatGPT, its possible negative effect on the EI of engineering and non-engineering students, and their level of EI. We built an online questionnaire that we shared electronically with students worldwide on the Facebook platform and in classrooms by uni-versity professors. We used Wong and Law's WLEIS self-report emotional intelligence scale and adapted it for our research. Most answers received are from Tunisia and Hungary. The findings demonstrate that students who study engineering tend to have lower emotional intelligence (EI) than non-engineering students. Additionally, the use of ChatGPT appears to have a somewhat detrimental impact on students' EI abilities, regardless of whether or not they have any concerns regarding artificial intelligence technology (AIT). However, it should be noted that students are still utilizing ChatGPT for both personal and academic purposes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In survey-like research, functional LLM-CB use was also associated with decreases in academic performance, impaired memory, emotional intelligence, procrastination, and cognitive dependency.
“In survey-like research, functional LLM-CB use was also associated with decreases in academic performance85, impaired memory96, emotional intelligence97, procrastination87,96, and cognitive dependency87,98.”
From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [97]
Cites
Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The rapid advancement of AIT will surround learning and teaching environments [18] [19], which poses both opportunities and challenges.”
BackgroundThe promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y · Cited by 984 · see citing works
An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research
Hosseini, M., Gao, C. A., Liebovitz, D. M., Carvalho, A. M., Ahmad, F. S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., Holmes, K. L., & Kho, A. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292216 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots
Diel, A., Torous, J., Cuijpers, P., Kleesiek, J., Nensa, F., Weber, N., Faust, F., Lalgi, T. J., Mellis, F. S., Teufel, M., et al. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-03054-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In survey-like research, functional LLM-CB use was also associated with decreases in academic performance 85 , impaired memory 96 , emotional intelligence 97 , procrastination 87,96 , and cognitive dependency 87,98 .”
- Authors
- Jammeli, H., Khefacha, A., Séllei, B., & Verny, J.
- Affiliations
- Normasys,Paris,France,75001
- Budapest University Of Technology and Economics, PhD School in Business and Management,Budapest,Hungary,1117
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
- NEOMA Business School,Mont-Saint-Aignan,France,76130
- Venue
- 2024 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-03-18
- Pages
- 208-214
- OpenAlex
- W4399376063
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
- Keywords
- AI tools, ChatGPT, emotional intelligence, engineering students, non-engineering students, university students, artificial intelligence in education, student skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review