Cited by 5Artificial Intelligence in EducationEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceSocial Skills and Education

The Impact of AI Tools in Education Environment

Jammeli, Haifa, Khefacha, Ahlem, Séllei, Beatrix, Verny, Jerome·2024·2024 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining popularity and influence in our society. New emerging artificial intelligence tools (AIT) are released to the public and are gaining momentum with a growing debate about the possible negative and positive effects of these new tools on students' skills, specifically their emotional intelligence (EI). This article addresses the scarcity of research related to Artificial Intelligence Tools AIT specifically ChatGPT, its possible negative effect on the EI of engineering and non-engineering students, and their level of EI. We built an online questionnaire that we shared electronically with students worldwide on the Facebook platform and in classrooms by uni-versity professors. We used Wong and Law's WLEIS self-report emotional intelligence scale and adapted it for our research. Most answers received are from Tunisia and Hungary. The findings demonstrate that students who study engineering tend to have lower emotional intelligence (EI) than non-engineering students. Additionally, the use of ChatGPT appears to have a somewhat detrimental impact on students' EI abilities, regardless of whether or not they have any concerns regarding artificial intelligence technology (AIT). However, it should be noted that students are still utilizing ChatGPT for both personal and academic purposes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iciet60671.2024.10542830

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In survey-like research, functional LLM-CB use was also associated with decreases in academic performance, impaired memory, emotional intelligence, procrastination, and cognitive dependency.

    “In survey-like research, functional LLM-CB use was also associated with decreases in academic performance85, impaired memory96, emotional intelligence97, procrastination87,96, and cognitive dependency87,98.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jammeli, H., Khefacha, A., Séllei, B., & Verny, J.
Affiliations
  • Normasys,Paris,France,75001
  • Budapest University Of Technology and Economics, PhD School in Business and Management,Budapest,Hungary,1117
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
  • NEOMA Business School,Mont-Saint-Aignan,France,76130
Venue
2024 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-03-18
Pages
208-214
OpenAlex
W4399376063
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
AI tools, ChatGPT, emotional intelligence, engineering students, non-engineering students, university students, artificial intelligence in education, student skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review