The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probabilistic associative learning of vessel motion patterns at multiple spatial scales for maritime situation awareness
Abstract
An improved neurobiologically inspired algorithm for situation awareness in the maritime domain is presented, which takes real-time tracking information and learns motion pattern models on-the- fly, enabling the models to adapt well to evolving situations while maintaining high levels of performance. The constantly refined models, resulting from concurrent incremental learning, are used to evaluate the behavior patterns of vessels based on their present motion states. Improvement to the associative learning law for learning temporal associations between vessel events enables conditional probabilities between events to be learned incrementally and locally. This allows weights in the learned model to be interpreted more readily, enabling better location prediction performance. Improvement in prediction performance is achieved by using multiple spatial scales to represent position, enabling the most relevant spatial scale to be used for local vessel behavior. Features and performance of these updates to the learning system using recorded data are described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, the fusion of heterogeneous information sources is not straightforward.”
From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“And third, their complexity usually does not scale well in relevant system parameters, e.g., the number of sensors.”
From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Second, they do not adapt to time-varying model parameters.”
From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- grossberg, 1982, Studies of Mind and Brain, 10.1007/978-94-009-7758-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.06.002 · DOI
- hu, 2006, A System for Learning Statistical Motion Patterns, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28, 1450, 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.176 · DOI
- bomberger, 2006, Associative Learning of Vessel Motion Patterns for Maritime Situation Awareness
- 10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605756 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soldi, G., Gaglione, D., Forti, N., Millefiori, L. M., Braca, P., Carniel, S., Simone, A. D., Iodice, A., Riccio, D., Daffina, F. C., et al. (2021) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/maes.2021.3070884 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhodes, B. J., Bomberger, N. A., & Zandipour, M.
- Affiliations
- BAE Systems (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Rhodes, Bradley J.
- Venue
- 2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007-07
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W1981587527
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- maritime situation awareness, associative learning, incremental learning, vessel tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review