The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system
Abstract
Biometric systems that use a single biometric trait have to contend with noisy data, restricted degrees of freedom, failure-to-enroll problems, spoof attacks, and unacceptable error rates. Multibiometric systems that use multiple traits of an individual for authentication, alleviate some of these problems while improving verification performance. We demonstrate that the performance of multibiometric systems can be further improved by learning user-specific parameters. Two types of parameters are considered here. (i) Thresholds that are used to decide if a matching score indicates a genuine user or an impostor, and (ii) weights that are used to indicate the importance of matching scores output by each biometric trait. User-specific thresholds are computed using the cumulative histogram of impostor matching scores corresponding to each user. The user-specific weights associated with each biometric are estimated by searching for that set of weights which minimizes the total verification error. The tests were conducted on a database of 50 users who provided fingerprint, face and hand geometry data, with 10 of these users providing data over a period of two months. We observed that user-specific thresholds improved system performance by /spl sim/ 2%, while user-specific weights improved performance by /spl sim/ 3%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Cited by
An introduction to biometric recognition
Jain, A. K., Ross, A., & Prabhakar, S. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2003.818349 · Cited by 4,974
Self-citationMultimodal Biometrics: An Overview
Ross, A., & Jain, A. (2004) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.38715 · Cited by 593
Self-citationJain, A. K., & Ross, A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/962081.962102 · Cited by 448
Self-citationMatching 2.5D face scans to 3D models
Lu, X., Jain, A. K., & Colbry, D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.15 · Cited by 339
Self-citationCombining Face and Iris Biometrics for Identity Verification
Wang, Y., Tan, T., & Jain, A. K. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44887-x_93 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, A. K., & Ross, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003-06-25
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- I-57-I-60
- ISSN
- 1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121292316
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icip.2002.1037958
- The paper
- Jain, A. K., & Ross, A. (2003). Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system. Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2002.1037958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.