The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain Tumor Type Classification via Capsule Networks
Open accessAbstract
Brain tumor is considered as one of the deadliest and most common form of cancer both in children and in adults. Consequently, determining the correct type of brain tumor in early stages is of significant importance to devise a precise treatment plan and predict patient's response to the adopted treatment. In this regard, there has been a recent surge of interest in designing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the problem of brain tumor type classification. However, CNNs typically require large amount of training data and can not properly handle input transformations. Capsule networks (referred to as CapsNets) are brand new machine learning architectures proposed very recently to overcome these shortcomings of CNNs, and posed to revolutionize deep learning solutions. Of particular interest to this work is that Capsule networks are robust to rotation and affine transformation, and require far less training data, which is the case for processing medical image datasets including brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images. In this paper, we focus to achieve the following four objectives: (i) Adopt and incorporate CapsNets for the problem of brain tumor classification to design an improved architecture which maximizes the accuracy of the classification problem at hand; (ii) Investigate the over-fitting problem of CapsNets based on a real set of MRI images; (iii) Explore whether or not CapsNets are capable of providing better fit for the whole brain images or just the segmented tumor, and; (iv) Develop a visualization paradigm for the output of the CapsNet to better explain the learned features. Our results show that the proposed approach can successfully overcome CNNs for the brain tumor classification problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21387 · Cited by 14,712
Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
Enhanced Performance of Brain Tumor Classification via Tumor Region Augmentation and Partition
Cheng, J., Huang, W., Cao, S., Yang, R., Yang, W., Yun, Z., Wang, Z., & Feng, Q. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140381 · Cited by 879
Cited by
Deep convolutional neural network based medical image classification for disease diagnosis
Yadav, S. S., & Jadhav, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0276-2 · Cited by 1,069
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079
Multi-grade brain tumor classification using deep CNN with extensive data augmentation
Sajjad, M., Khan, S., Muhammad, K., Wu, W., Ullah, A., & Baik, S. W. (2019) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2018.12.003 · Cited by 891
A Deep Learning Model Based on Concatenation Approach for the Diagnosis of Brain Tumor
Noreen, N., Palaniappan, S., Qayyum, A., Ahmad, I., Imran, M., & Shoaib, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2978629 · Cited by 478
Deep CNN for Brain Tumor Classification
Ayadi, W., Elhamzi, W., Charfi, I., & Atri, M. (2021) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-020-10398-2 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Afshar, P., Mohammadi, A., & Plataniotis, K. N.
- Venue
- 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-10
- Pages
- 3129-3133
- ISSN
- 1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787889308
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Tumor Type Classification via Capsule Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icip.2018.8451379
- The paper
- Afshar, P., Mohammadi, A., & Plataniotis, K. N. (2018). Brain Tumor Type Classification via Capsule Networks. 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2018.8451379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.