Evaluating Self-Supervised Learning Methods for Downstream Classification of Neoplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus
Open accessAbstract
A major problem in applying machine learning for the medical domain is the scarcity of labeled data, which results in the demand for methods that enable high-quality models trained with little to no labels. Self-supervised learning methods present a plausible solution to this problem, enabling the use of large sets of unlabeled data for model pretraining. In this study, multiple of these methods and training strategies are employed on a large dataset of endoscopic images from the gastrointestinal tract (GastroNet). The suitability of these methods is assessed for an intra-domain downstream classification task on a small endoscopic dataset, involving neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. The classification performances are compared against pretraining on ImageNet and training from scratch. This yields promising results for domain-specific self-supervised methods, where super-resolution outperforms pretraining on ImageNet with a mean classification accuracy of 83.8% (cf. 79.2%). This implies that the large amounts of unlabeled data in hospitals could be employed in combination with self-supervised learning methods to improve models for downstream tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Cornelissen, S., van der Putten, J. A., Boers, T. G. W., Jukema, J. B., Fockens, K. N., Bergman, J. J. G. H. M., van der Sommen, F., & de With, P. H. N.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Eindhoven University of Technology,Department of Electrical Engineering,Eindhoven,The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-09-19
- Volume
- 9907 lncs
- Pages
- 66-70
- ISSN
- 1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3193904736
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Locations
- Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- self-supervised learning, Barrett's esophagus, endoscopic images, unlabeled data, domain-specific pre-training, ImageNet pre-training, small labeled datasets, medical image classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review